Roffe Christine, Nevatte Tracy, Sim Julius, Bishop Jon, Ives Natalie, Ferdinand Phillip, Gray Richard
University Hospital of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
JAMA. 2017 Sep 26;318(12):1125-1135. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11463.
Hypoxia is common in the first few days after acute stroke, is frequently intermittent, and is often undetected. Oxygen supplementation could prevent hypoxia and secondary neurological deterioration and thus has the potential to improve recovery.
To assess whether routine prophylactic low-dose oxygen therapy was more effective than control oxygen administration in reducing death and disability at 90 days, and if so, whether oxygen given at night only, when hypoxia is most frequent, and oxygen administration is least likely to interfere with rehabilitation, was more effective than continuous supplementation.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this single-blind randomized clinical trial, 8003 adults with acute stroke were enrolled from 136 participating centers in the United Kingdom within 24 hours of hospital admission if they had no clear indications for or contraindications to oxygen treatment (first patient enrolled April 24, 2008; last follow-up January 27, 2015).
Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to continuous oxygen for 72 hours (n = 2668), nocturnal oxygen (21:00 to 07:00 hours) for 3 nights (n = 2667), or control (oxygen only if clinically indicated; n = 2668). Oxygen was given via nasal tubes at 3 L/min if baseline oxygen saturation was 93% or less and at 2 L/min if oxygen saturation was greater than 93%.
The primary outcome was reported using the modified Rankin Scale score (disability range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]; minimum clinically important difference, 1 point), assessed at 90 days by postal questionnaire (participant aware, assessor blinded). The modified Rankin Scale score was analyzed by ordinal logistic regression, which yields a common odds ratio (OR) for a change from one disability level to the next better (lower) level; OR greater than 1.00 indicates improvement.
A total of 8003 patients (4398 (55%) men; mean [SD] age, 72 [13] years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 5; mean baseline oxygen saturation, 96.6%) were enrolled. The primary outcome was available for 7677 (96%) participants. The unadjusted OR for a better outcome (calculated via ordinal logistic regression) was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.05; P = .47) for oxygen vs control, and the OR was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.13; P = .61) for continuous vs nocturnal oxygen. No subgroup could be identified that benefited from oxygen. At least 1 serious adverse event occurred in 348 (13.0%) participants in the continuous oxygen group, 294 (11.0%) in the nocturnal group, and 322 (12.1%) in the control group. No significant harms were identified.
Among nonhypoxic patients with acute stroke, the prophylactic use of low-dose oxygen supplementation did not reduce death or disability at 3 months. These findings do not support low-dose oxygen in this setting.
ISRCTN Identifier: ISRCTN52416964.
缺氧在急性卒中后的头几天很常见,常为间歇性,且常未被检测到。补充氧气可预防缺氧和继发性神经功能恶化,因此有可能改善恢复情况。
评估常规预防性低剂量氧疗在降低90天时的死亡率和残疾率方面是否比对照氧疗更有效;如果是,仅在夜间(缺氧最频繁且氧疗最不可能干扰康复时)给予氧气是否比持续补充氧气更有效。
设计、设置和参与者:在这项单盲随机临床试验中,8003名急性卒中成人患者在英国136个参与中心于入院后24小时内入组,前提是他们没有明确的氧疗指征或禁忌证(第一名患者于2008年4月24日入组;最后一次随访于2015年1月27日)。
参与者按1:1:1随机分组,分别接受72小时持续吸氧(n = 2668)、夜间吸氧(21:00至07:00)共3晚(n = 2667)或对照(仅在临床指征明确时吸氧;n = 2668)。如果基线血氧饱和度为93%或更低,则通过鼻导管以3 L/分钟的速度给予氧气;如果血氧饱和度大于93%,则以2 L/分钟的速度给予氧气。
主要结局通过改良Rankin量表评分报告(残疾范围为0[无症状]至6[死亡];最小临床重要差异为1分),在90天时通过邮寄问卷进行评估(参与者知情,评估者不知情)。改良Rankin量表评分通过有序逻辑回归分析,该分析得出从一个残疾水平转变为下一个更好(更低)水平的共同比值比(OR);OR大于1.00表示改善。
共纳入8003例患者(4398例[55%]为男性;平均[标准差]年龄为72[13]岁;美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分中位数为5;平均基线血氧饱和度为96.6%)。7677例(96%)参与者有主要结局数据。吸氧组与对照组相比,未调整的更好结局的OR(通过有序逻辑回归计算)为0.97(95%CI,0.89至1.