Barrowclough Christine, Meier Petra, Beardmore Ruth, Emsley Richard
School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010 May;198(5):373-7. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181da4d4e.
The importance of therapeutic alliance in predicting treatment outcomes is well established, but less is known about client characteristics that predict alliance. Clients with co-occurring psychosis and substance misuse (n = 116) who received integrated motivational interviewing and cognitive behavior therapy in the context of a large randomized controlled trial completed the Working Alliance Inventory. Their trial therapists also completed Working Alliance Inventories. Rating perspectives were compared, and in a cross-sectional study, client predictors of therapeutic alliance were examined. As hypothesized, clients' negative attitudes to treatment, including lack of insight, were predictive of poorer alliance. Therapist-rated alliance was also predicted by the client's attitude to medication, self-reported depression, and living situation. Symptom severity and substance use measures were unrelated to alliance. Consistent with previous studies, rating perspectives differed, with clients rating alliance more positive than therapists.
治疗联盟在预测治疗结果方面的重要性已得到充分证实,但对于预测联盟的来访者特征却知之甚少。在一项大型随机对照试验中,同时患有精神病和药物滥用问题的来访者(n = 116)接受了综合动机访谈和认知行为疗法,并完成了工作联盟量表。他们的治疗师也完成了工作联盟量表。对评分视角进行了比较,并在一项横断面研究中,考察了治疗联盟的来访者预测因素。正如所假设的那样,来访者对治疗的消极态度,包括缺乏洞察力,预示着联盟较差。来访者对药物的态度、自我报告的抑郁和生活状况也能预测治疗师评定的联盟。症状严重程度和药物使用指标与联盟无关。与先前的研究一致,评分视角存在差异,来访者对联盟的评分比治疗师更积极。