Kanz Karl-Georg, Paul April O, Lefering Rolf, Kay Mike V, Kreimeier Uwe, Linsenmaier Ulrich, Mutschler Wolf, Huber-Wagner Stefan
Munich University Hospital, Department of Trauma Surgery - Campus Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2010 May 10;4:4. doi: 10.1186/1752-2897-4-4.
Immediate recognition of life-threatening conditions and injuries is the key to trauma management. To date, the impact of focused assessment with computed tomography in trauma (FACTT) has not been formally assessed. We aimed to find out whether the concept of using FACTT during primary trauma survey has a negative or positive effect on survival.
In a retrospective, multicentre study, we compared our time management and probability of survival (Ps) in major trauma patients who received FACTT during trauma resuscitation with the trauma registry of the German Trauma Society (DGU). FACTT is defined as whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) during primary trauma survey. We determined the probability of survival according to the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), the Revised Injury Severity Classification score (RISC) and the standardized mortality ratio (SMR).
We analysed 4.817 patients from the DGU database from 2002 until 2004, 160 (3.3%) were from our trauma centre at the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) and 4.657 (96.7%) from the DGU group. 73.2% were male with a mean age of 42.5 years, a mean ISS of 29.8. 96.2% had suffered from blunt trauma. Time from admission to FAST (focused assessment with sonography for trauma)(4.3 vs. 8.7 min), chest x-ray (8.1 vs. 16.0 min) and whole-body CT (20.7 vs. 36.6 min) was shorter at the LMU compared to the other trauma centres (p < 0.001). SMR calculated by TRISS was 0.74 (CI95% 0.40-1.08) for the LMU (p = 0.24) and 0.92 (CI95% 0.84-1.01) for the DGU group (p = 0.10). RISC methodology revealed a SMR of 0.69 (95%CI 0.47-0.92) for the LMU (p = 0.043) and 1.00 (95%CI 0.94-1.06) for the DGU group (p = 0.88).
Trauma management incorporating FACTT enhances a rapid response to life-threatening problems and enables a comprehensive assessment of the severity of each relevant injury. Due to its speed and accuracy, FACTT during primary trauma survey supports rapid decision-making and may increase survival.
及时识别危及生命的状况和损伤是创伤管理的关键。迄今为止,创伤计算机断层扫描重点评估(FACTT)的影响尚未得到正式评估。我们旨在查明在初级创伤评估期间使用FACTT这一概念对生存率有负面影响还是正面影响。
在一项回顾性多中心研究中,我们将在创伤复苏期间接受FACTT的严重创伤患者的时间管理和生存概率(Ps)与德国创伤协会(DGU)的创伤登记数据进行了比较。FACTT定义为初级创伤评估期间的全身计算机断层扫描(WBCT)。我们根据创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)、修订的损伤严重程度分类评分(RISC)和标准化死亡率(SMR)确定生存概率。
我们分析了2002年至2004年DGU数据库中的4817例患者,其中160例(3.3%)来自路德维希 - 马克西米利安大学(LMU)我们的创伤中心,4657例(96.7%)来自DGU组。73.2%为男性,平均年龄42.5岁,平均损伤严重程度评分(ISS)为29.8。96.2%为钝性创伤。与其他创伤中心相比,LMU从入院到创伤超声重点评估(FAST)(4.3对8.7分钟)、胸部X光检查(8.1对16.0分钟)和全身CT(20.7对36.6分钟)的时间更短(p<0.001)。根据TRISS计算,LMU的SMR为0.74(95%CI 0.40 - 1.08)(p = 0.24),DGU组为0.92(95%CI 0.84 - 1.01)(p = 0.10)。RISC方法显示,LMU的SMR为0.69(95%CI 0.47 - 0.92)(p = 0.043),DGU组为1.00(95%CI 0.94 - 1.06)(p = 0.88)。
纳入FACTT的创伤管理可增强对危及生命问题的快速反应,并能对每种相关损伤的严重程度进行全面评估。由于其速度和准确性,初级创伤评估期间的FACTT有助于快速决策并可能提高生存率。