• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过实施核心 6 小时bundle 降低严重脓毒症的死亡率:来自葡萄牙社区获得性脓毒症研究(SACiUCI 研究)的结果。

Reducing mortality in severe sepsis with the implementation of a core 6-hour bundle: results from the Portuguese community-acquired sepsis study (SACiUCI study).

机构信息

Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos Polivalente, Hospital Geral de Santo António, University of Porto, Largo Prof, Abel Salazar, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R83. doi: 10.1186/cc9008. Epub 2010 May 10.

DOI:10.1186/cc9008
PMID:20459716
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2911711/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the impact of compliance with a core version of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign 6-hour bundle on 28 days mortality.

METHODS

Cohort, multi-centre, prospective study on community-acquired sepsis (CAS).

RESULTS

Seventeen intensive care units (ICU) entered the study. Over a one year period, 4,142 patients were enrolled in the study. Of the 897 (24%) admitted with CAS, 778 (87%) had severe sepsis or septic shock on ICU admission. In the first six hours of hospital admission: (1) 62% had serum lactate measured; (2) 69% fluids administered; (3) 77% specimens collected for microbiology before antibiotic administration; (4) 48% blood cultures obtained; (5) 52% antibiotics administered within the first hour of the diagnosis; (6) vasopressors were given in 78%; (7) 56% had central venous measurement (CVP) measurement; (8) 17% had a central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) measurement; (9) dobutamine was administered in 52%. Compliance with all actions 1 to 6 (core bundle) was associated with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.44 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.24-0.80] in severe sepsis and 0.49 (95% CI = 0.25-0.95) in septic shock, for 28 days mortality. This corresponded to a number needed to treat of 6 patients to save one life.

CONCLUSIONS

Compliance with this core bundle was associated with a significant reduction in the 28 days mortality. Urgent action should be taken in order to ensure that early sepsis diagnosis is followed by full completion of this "core bundle" followed by activation of expertise help in severe sepsis.

摘要

简介

评估遵守 6 小时捆绑包的核心版本对 28 天死亡率的影响。

方法

社区获得性败血症(CAS)的队列、多中心、前瞻性研究。

结果

17 个重症监护病房(ICU)参与了这项研究。在一年的时间里,共有 4142 名患者入组。在 897 名(24%)因 CAS 入院的患者中,778 名(87%)在 ICU 入院时患有严重败血症或感染性休克。在入院后的头 6 小时内:(1)62%的患者进行了血清乳酸测量;(2)69%的患者进行了补液;(3)77%的患者在使用抗生素前采集了微生物标本;(4)48%的患者采集了血培养;(5)52%的患者在确诊后 1 小时内使用了抗生素;(6)78%的患者使用了升压药;(7)56%的患者进行了中心静脉压(CVP)测量;(8)17%的患者进行了中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO2)测量;(9)52%的患者使用了多巴酚丁胺。严重败血症和感染性休克患者的所有行动 1 至 6(核心捆绑)的遵守情况与 28 天死亡率的比值比(OR)相关,分别为 0.44(95%置信区间(CI)=0.24-0.80)和 0.49(95%CI=0.25-0.95)。这相当于每治疗 6 名患者就需要治疗一名患者才能挽救一条生命。

结论

遵守这个核心捆绑包与降低 28 天死亡率显著相关。应采取紧急行动,确保早期败血症诊断后,全面完成这一“核心捆绑包”,并在严重败血症时激活专业帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f384/2911711/fdb92853e17a/cc9008-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f384/2911711/fdb92853e17a/cc9008-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f384/2911711/fdb92853e17a/cc9008-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Reducing mortality in severe sepsis with the implementation of a core 6-hour bundle: results from the Portuguese community-acquired sepsis study (SACiUCI study).通过实施核心 6 小时bundle 降低严重脓毒症的死亡率:来自葡萄牙社区获得性脓毒症研究(SACiUCI 研究)的结果。
Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R83. doi: 10.1186/cc9008. Epub 2010 May 10.
2
Differences in compliance with Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommendations according to hospital entrance time: day versus night.根据入院时间(白天与夜晚)对脓毒症存活策略建议的依从性差异。
Crit Care. 2013 Apr 23;17(2):R79. doi: 10.1186/cc12689.
3
Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain.西班牙一项多中心严重脓毒症教育项目实施后护理过程及结局的改善
JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2294-303. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2294.
4
Impact of Compliance with a Sepsis Resuscitation Bundle in a Portuguese Emergency Department.葡萄牙急诊科中脓毒症复苏集束化治疗依从性的影响
Acta Med Port. 2016 Feb;29(2):88-94. doi: 10.20344/amp.6998. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
5
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
6
Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality.实施一系列用于严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克早期管理的质量指标与死亡率降低相关。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1105-12. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259463.33848.3D.
7
Relationship Between a Sepsis Intervention Bundle and In-Hospital Mortality Among Hospitalized Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data.脓毒症干预集束与住院患者院内死亡率之间的关系:基于真实世界数据的回顾性分析
Anesth Analg. 2017 Aug;125(2):507-513. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002085.
8
Influence of vasopressor agent in septic shock mortality. Results from the Portuguese Community-Acquired Sepsis Study (SACiUCI study).血管升压药对感染性休克死亡率的影响。葡萄牙社区获得性脓毒症研究(SACiUCI研究)的结果。
Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):410-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181958b1c.
9
Bloodstream infections as a marker of community-acquired sepsis severity. Results from the Portuguese community-acquired sepsis study (SACiUCI study).血流感染作为社区获得性脓毒症严重程度的标志物。葡萄牙社区获得性脓毒症研究(SACiUCI 研究)的结果。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Mar;19(3):242-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03776.x. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
10
Resuscitation bundle compliance in severe sepsis and septic shock: improves survival, is better late than never.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克中复苏集束化治疗的依从性:可提高生存率,亡羊补牢,为时未晚。
J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):304-13. doi: 10.1177/0885066610392499. Epub 2011 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Early management of adult sepsis and septic shock: Korean clinical practice guidelines.成人脓毒症和脓毒性休克的早期管理:韩国临床实践指南
Acute Crit Care. 2024 Nov;39(4):445-472. doi: 10.4266/acc.2024.00920. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
2
Decrease in Mortality after the Implementation of a Hospital Model to Improve Performance in Sepsis Care: Princess Sepsis Code.实施医院模式以改善脓毒症护理绩效后的死亡率下降:公主脓毒症代码。
J Pers Med. 2024 Jan 29;14(2):149. doi: 10.3390/jpm14020149.
3
Effect of ICU care bundles on long-term patient-relevant outcomes: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality Distribution in a Trauma System: From Data to Health Policy Recommendations.创伤系统中的死亡率分布:从数据到卫生政策建议。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2008 Dec;34(6):561-9. doi: 10.1007/s00068-007-6189-3. Epub 2008 Feb 9.
2
Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients.危重症患者强化血糖控制与常规血糖控制的比较
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1283-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810625. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
3
Influence of vasopressor agent in septic shock mortality. Results from the Portuguese Community-Acquired Sepsis Study (SACiUCI study).
ICU 护理包对长期与患者相关结局的影响:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 17;13(2):e070962. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070962.
4
The impact of a sepsis performance improvement program in the emergency department: a before-after intervention study.急诊脓毒症改进项目的影响:一项前后干预研究。
Infection. 2023 Aug;51(4):945-954. doi: 10.1007/s15010-022-01957-x. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
5
Clinical decision support improves blood culture collection before intravenous antibiotic administration in the emergency department.临床决策支持可提高急诊静脉用抗生素给药前血培养采集率。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Sep 12;29(10):1705-1714. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac115.
6
Sepsis Performance Improvement Programs: From Evidence Toward Clinical Implementation.脓毒症绩效改进计划:从证据到临床实施
Crit Care. 2022 Mar 22;26(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03917-1.
7
Impact of prior antibiotic therapy on severe necrotizing soft-tissue infections in ICU patients: results from a French retrospective and observational study.抗生素治疗史对 ICU 患者严重坏死性软组织感染的影响:来自法国回顾性和观察性研究的结果。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;41(1):109-117. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04354-8. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
8
Compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guideline 1-hour bundle for septic shock in China in 2018.2018年中国对脓毒性休克患者遵循拯救脓毒症运动1小时集束化治疗指南的情况。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Feb;9(4):278. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-5429.
9
Epidemiology of Sepsis Syndrome among Intensive Care Unit Patients at a Tertiary University Hospital in Palestine in 2019.2019年巴勒斯坦一所三级大学医院重症监护病房患者中脓毒症综合征的流行病学情况
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Jul;24(7):551-556. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23474.
10
Immune Response in Bacterial and Sepsis.细菌感染与脓毒症中的免疫反应
Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2019 Oct 4;9(4):105-113. doi: 10.1556/1886.2019.00011. eCollection 2019 Dec 25.
血管升压药对感染性休克死亡率的影响。葡萄牙社区获得性脓毒症研究(SACiUCI研究)的结果。
Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):410-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181958b1c.
4
Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain.西班牙一项多中心严重脓毒症教育项目实施后护理过程及结局的改善
JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2294-303. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2294.
5
Hydrocortisone therapy for patients with septic shock.氢化可的松治疗感染性休克患者。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 10;358(2):111-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071366.
6
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克治疗国际指南:2008年版
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):296-327. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41.
7
Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality.实施一系列用于严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克早期管理的质量指标与死亡率降低相关。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1105-12. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259463.33848.3D.
8
Early goal-directed therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock revisited: concepts, controversies, and contemporary findings.重温严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的早期目标导向治疗:概念、争议与当代研究结果
Chest. 2006 Nov;130(5):1579-95. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.5.1579.
9
Failure to implement evidence-based clinical guidelines for sepsis at the ED.急诊科未能实施基于证据的脓毒症临床指南。
Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Sep;24(5):553-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.01.012.
10
Implementation and outcomes of the Multiple Urgent Sepsis Therapies (MUST) protocol.多重紧急脓毒症治疗(MUST)方案的实施与结果
Crit Care Med. 2006 Apr;34(4):1025-32. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000206104.18647.A8.