Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Institute for Medical Knowledge Management, Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF), Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 17;13(2):e070962. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070962.
Care bundles are considered a key tool to improve bedside quality of care in the intensive care unit (ICU). We explored their effect on long-term patient-relevant outcomes.
Systematic literature search and scoping review.
We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo, Web of Science, CDSR and CENTRAL for keywords of intensive care, care bundles, patient-relevant outcomes, and follow-up studies.
Original articles with patients admitted to adult ICUs assessing bundle implementations and measuring long-term (ie, ICU discharge or later) patient-relevant outcomes (ie, mortality, health-related quality of life (HrQoL), post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), care-related outcomes, adverse events, and social health).
After dual, independent, two-stage selection and charting, eligible records were critically appraised and assessed for bundle type, implementation strategies, and effects on long-term patient-relevant outcomes.
Of 2012 records, 38 met inclusion criteria; 55% (n=21) were before-after studies, 21% (n=8) observational cohort studies, 13% (n=5) randomised controlled trials, and 11% (n=4) had other designs. Bundles pertained to sepsis (n=11), neurocognition (n=6), communication (n=4), early rehabilitation (n=3), pharmacological discontinuation (n=3), ventilation (n=2) or combined bundles (n=9). Almost two-thirds of the studies reported on survival (n=24), 45% (n=17) on care-related outcomes (eg, discharge disposition), and 13% (n=5) of studies on HrQoL. Regarding PICS, 24% (n=9) assessed cognition, 13% (n=5) physical health, and 11% (n=4) mental health, up to 1 year after discharge. The effects of bundles on long-term patient-relevant outcomes was inconclusive, except for a positive effect of sepsis bundles on survival. The inconclusive effects may have been due to the high risk of bias in included studies and the variability in implementation strategies, instruments, and follow-up times.
There is a need to explore the long-term effects of ICU bundles on HrQoL and PICS. Closing this knowledge gap appears vital to determine if there is long-term patient value of ICU bundles.
护理套餐被认为是提高重症监护病房(ICU)床边护理质量的关键工具。我们探讨了它们对长期患者相关结局的影响。
系统文献检索和范围综述。
我们在 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、APA PsycInfo、Web of Science、CDSR 和 CENTRAL 中搜索了重症监护、护理套餐、患者相关结局和随访研究的关键词。
评估套餐实施情况并测量长期(即 ICU 出院或之后)患者相关结局(即死亡率、健康相关生活质量(HrQoL)、重症监护后综合征(PICS)、护理相关结局、不良事件和社会健康)的成年 ICU 患者的原始文章。
经过双重、独立的两阶段选择和图表绘制,合格的记录经过严格评估,并评估了套餐类型、实施策略以及对长期患者相关结局的影响。
在 2012 条记录中,有 38 条符合纳入标准;55%(n=21)为前后对照研究,21%(n=8)为观察性队列研究,13%(n=5)为随机对照试验,11%(n=4)为其他设计。套餐涉及脓毒症(n=11)、神经认知(n=6)、沟通(n=4)、早期康复(n=3)、药物停用(n=3)、通气(n=2)或综合套餐(n=9)。近三分之二的研究报告了生存率(n=24),45%(n=17)报告了护理相关结局(例如出院去向),13%(n=5)的研究报告了健康相关生活质量。关于 PICS,24%(n=9)评估认知,13%(n=5)评估身体健康,11%(n=4)评估心理健康,直至出院后 1 年。套餐对长期患者相关结局的影响尚无定论,除脓毒症套餐对生存率有积极影响外。这种不确定的效果可能是由于纳入研究的高偏倚风险以及实施策略、工具和随访时间的差异所致。
需要探索 ICU 套餐对健康相关生活质量和 PICS 的长期影响。缩小这一知识差距对于确定 ICU 套餐是否对患者具有长期价值至关重要。