• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Are housing and neighbourhood empowerment beneficial for mental health and wellbeing? Evidence from disadvantaged communities experiencing regeneration.住房和社区赋权对心理健康和幸福有益吗?来自经历再生的弱势社区的证据。
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Aug 20;12:100645. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100645. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Protocol for a mixed methods study investigating the impact of investment in housing, regeneration and neighbourhood renewal on the health and wellbeing of residents: the GoWell programme.一项混合方法研究的方案,旨在调查投资住房、再生和社区更新对居民健康和福利的影响:GoWell 计划。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 May 11;10:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-41.
3
Investigating health and social outcomes of the Big Local community empowerment initiative in England: a mixed method evaluation.调查英格兰“大地方”社区赋权计划对健康和社会结果的影响:一项混合方法评估。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Oct;11(9):1-147. doi: 10.3310/GRMA6711.
4
Urban regeneration and mental health: Investigating the effects of an area-based intervention using a modified intention to treat analysis with alternative outcome measures.城市再生与心理健康:利用基于区域的干预措施,采用修改后的意向治疗分析和替代结果测量方法进行研究。
Health Place. 2020 Jan;61:102262. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102262. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
5
Exploring the relationships between housing, neighbourhoods and mental wellbeing for residents of deprived areas.探索贫困地区居民住房、社区与心理健康之间的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 18;12:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-48.
6
Community empowerment and mental wellbeing: longitudinal findings from a survey of people actively involved in the big local place-based initiative in England.社区赋权与心理健康:一项针对积极参与英格兰大型地方计划的人群的调查的纵向研究结果。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Jun 14;45(2):423-431. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdac073.
7
Longitudinal association between change in the neighbourhood built environment and the wellbeing of local residents in deprived areas: an observational study.在贫困地区,邻里建成环境变化与当地居民福祉之间的纵向关联:一项观察性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 24;18(1):545. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5459-9.
8
Associations of internet access with social integration, wellbeing and physical activity among adults in deprived communities: evidence from a household survey.互联网接入与贫困社区成年人社会融合、幸福感和身体活动的关联:来自家庭调查的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 2;19(1):860. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7199-x.
9
Neighbourhood demolition, relocation and health. A qualitative longitudinal study of housing-led urban regeneration in Glasgow, UK.社区拆除、搬迁与健康。英国格拉斯哥以住房为主导的城市更新的定性纵向研究。
Health Place. 2015 May;33:101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-creating community wellbeing initiatives: what is the evidence and how do they work?共同创建社区福祉倡议:有哪些证据以及它们是如何发挥作用的?
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2024 Aug 5;18(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13033-024-00645-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Power through: A new concept in the empowerment discourse.坚持到底:赋权话语中的一个新概念。
Glob Food Sec. 2019 Jun;21:13-17. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.07.001.
2
The interaction between individualism and wellbeing in predicting mortality: Survey of Health Ageing and Retirement in Europe.个体主义与幸福感在预测死亡率方面的相互作用:欧洲健康老龄化和退休调查。
J Behav Med. 2018 Feb;41(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s10865-017-9871-x. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
3
Improving Mental Health Through the Regeneration of Deprived Neighborhoods: A Natural Experiment.通过改造贫困社区改善心理健康:一项自然实验。
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Aug 15;186(4):473-480. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx086.
4
Trust and health: testing the reverse causality hypothesis.信任与健康:检验反向因果关系假说。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Jan;70(1):10-6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-205822. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
5
Systematic review of empowerment measures in health promotion.健康促进中赋权措施的系统评价
Health Promot Int. 2016 Dec;31(4):809-826. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dav059. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
6
The effectiveness of community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups: a meta-analysis.社区参与对弱势群体公共卫生干预措施的有效性:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 12;15:129. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1352-y.
7
Evaluating the health inequalities impact of area-based initiatives across the socioeconomic spectrum: a controlled intervention study of the New Deal for Communities, 2002-2008.评估基于地区的举措对社会经济各阶层健康不平等状况的影响:2002 - 2008年社区新政的对照干预研究
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Oct;68(10):979-86. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-203902. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
8
Evaluating community engagement as part of the public health system.评估社区参与作为公共卫生系统的一部分。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Jul;68(7):692-6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-203742. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
9
Well London Phase-1: results among adults of a cluster-randomised trial of a community engagement approach to improving health behaviours and mental well-being in deprived inner-city neighbourhoods.伦敦第一阶段:一项集群随机试验的成年人群结果,该试验采用社区参与方法改善贫困市中心社区的健康行为和心理健康。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Jul;68(7):606-14. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-202505. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
10
Social capital as a resource for mental well-being in older people: a systematic review.社会资本作为老年人心理健康的资源:系统评价。
Aging Ment Health. 2013;17(4):394-410. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2012.742490. Epub 2012 Nov 27.

住房和社区赋权对心理健康和幸福有益吗?来自经历再生的弱势社区的证据。

Are housing and neighbourhood empowerment beneficial for mental health and wellbeing? Evidence from disadvantaged communities experiencing regeneration.

作者信息

Kearns Ade, Whitley Elise

机构信息

Urban Studies, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, 25 Bute Gardens, Glasgow, G12 0NU, UK.

MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3QB, UK.

出版信息

SSM Popul Health. 2020 Aug 20;12:100645. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100645. eCollection 2020 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100645
PMID:33072841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7549141/
Abstract

Community engagement and empowerment are central to delivery and outcomes from regeneration programmes, yet evidence for health gains in such contexts is sparse and mixed. This study addresses this issue in respect of mental health and wellbeing in disadvantaged communities in the UK, using a sample of 2862 householders living through housing improvements and regeneration in Glasgow. Feelings of empowerment were more strongly associated with mental wellbeing (WEMWBS) than mental health (SF-12 MCS). Neighbourhood empowerment was more strongly associated with mental wellbeing and mental health than housing empowerment, although its association with mental health disappeared in the period of welfare reform and austerity. Proactive forms of empowerment, such as influencing decisions affecting an area or taking action oneself to improve things, were more strongly associated with mental wellbeing than reactive or passive forms of empowerment. There is much scope to improve feelings of empowerment in disadvantaged communities and to contribute to national objectives to enhance mental wellbeing.

摘要

社区参与和赋权是再生计划实施及成果的核心,但在此背景下健康收益的证据却稀少且参差不齐。本研究针对英国弱势社区的心理健康和幸福感问题,以格拉斯哥2862户经历住房改善和再生的住户为样本进行研究。赋权感与心理健康状况(WEMWBS)的关联比与精神健康状况(SF - 12 MCS)的关联更强。邻里赋权与心理健康状况和精神健康状况的关联比住房赋权更强,尽管在福利改革和紧缩时期其与精神健康的关联消失了。积极形式的赋权,如影响影响某地区的决策或自己采取行动改善情况,与心理健康状况的关联比被动或消极形式的赋权更强。在弱势社区提高赋权感并为增进心理健康的国家目标做出贡献仍有很大空间。