Rehabilitation Sciences Research Graduate Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 May 11;10:119. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-119.
There is worldwide variation in rehabilitation practices after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and no agreement on which interventions will lead to optimal short and long term patient outcomes. As a first step in the development of clinical practice guidelines for post-acute rehabilitation after THA and TKA, we explored experiences and attitudes about rehabilitation practices and outcomes in groups of individuals identified as key stakeholders.
Separate focus groups and interviews were conducted with patients (THA or TKA within past year) and three health professional groups: allied health professionals (AHPs), orthopaedic surgeons, and other physicians, in Canada and the United States. Pairs of moderators led the focus groups using a standardized discussion guide. Discussions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. A content analysis within and across groups identified key themes.
Eleven focus groups and eight interviews took place in six sites. Patients (n = 32) varied in age, stage of recovery, and surgical and rehabilitation experiences. Health professionals (n = 44) represented a range of disciplines, practice settings and years of experience. Six key themes emerged: 1) Let's talk (issues related to patient-health professional and inter-professional communication); 2) Expecting the unexpected (observations about unanticipated recovery experiences); 3) It's attitude that counts (the importance of the patient's positive attitude and participation in recovery); 4) It takes all kinds of support (along the continuum of care); 5) Barriers to recovery (at patient, provider and system levels), and 6) Back to normal (reflecting diversity of expected outcomes). Patients offered different, but overlapping views compared to health professionals regarding rehabilitation practices and outcomes following THA and TKA.
Results will inform subsequent phases of guideline development and ensure stakeholders' perspectives shape the priorities, content and scope of the guidelines.
全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的康复实践在世界范围内存在差异,对于哪些干预措施将导致最佳的短期和长期患者结局尚无共识。作为制定 THA 和 TKA 后急性康复临床实践指南的第一步,我们在被确定为关键利益相关者的人群中探索了对康复实践和结果的经验和态度。
在加拿大和美国,分别对患者(THA 或 TKA 在过去一年中进行)和三个卫生专业人员群体:辅助卫生专业人员(AHPs)、矫形外科医生和其他医生进行了单独的焦点小组和访谈。由两名主持人使用标准化的讨论指南领导焦点小组。讨论进行了录音和逐字记录。在组内和组间进行了内容分析,以确定关键主题。
在六个地点进行了 11 个焦点小组和 8 次访谈。患者(n=32)在年龄、康复阶段和手术及康复经验方面存在差异。卫生专业人员(n=44)代表了不同的学科、实践环境和多年的经验。出现了六个关键主题:1)让我们谈谈(与患者-卫生专业人员和跨专业沟通相关的问题);2)期待意外(对意外康复经历的观察);3)态度很重要(患者积极态度和参与康复的重要性);4)需要各种支持(在整个护理过程中);5)康复障碍(在患者、提供者和系统层面),以及 6)恢复正常(反映预期结果的多样性)。与健康专业人员相比,患者对 THA 和 TKA 后的康复实践和结果提出了不同但重叠的观点。
结果将为指南制定的后续阶段提供信息,并确保利益相关者的观点影响指南的重点、内容和范围。