• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节和膝关节置换康复的质量指标制定。

Development of quality indicators for hip and knee arthroplasty rehabilitation.

机构信息

Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, 2635 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada.

Department of Community Health Sciences, Arthur JE Child Chair in Rheumatology Research, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Mar;26(3):370-382. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2017.10.020
PMID:29292095
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop quality indicators (QIs) reflecting the minimum acceptable standard of rehabilitation care before and after elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Informed by high quality evidence and using a modified RAND-UCLA Delphi approach, an 18-member Canadian panel of clinicians, researchers and patients considered 81 proposed QIs (40 for THA, 42 for TKA) addressing rehabilitation before and after elective THA and TKA. Panelists rated QIs for their importance and validity on a 9-point Likert scale through two rounds of online rating interspersed with a moderated and anonymous online discussion forum. Those QIs with median ratings of ≥7 for importance and validity with no disagreement based on the inter-percentile range adjusted for symmetry were included in the final sets.

RESULTS

Fifteen panelists from seven provinces and varied practice settings completed the Delphi process. Of the 81 plus one additional QIs (total of 82), 67 (82%) were rated as both important and valid (31 for THA, 36 for TKA). For THA, 14 pre-op, six acute and eight post-acute QIs were accepted. For TKA, 16 pre-op, 10 acute and eight post-acute indicators were accepted. Two of three 'across-continuum' QIs were rated appropriate for both procedures.

CONCLUSION

This work represents the first QIs with which to measure, report and benchmark quality of care in patients receiving rehabilitation before and after THA/TKA surgery. The QIs will be further tested for reliability and feasibility before being widely disseminated in clinical settings and used to assess care gaps.

摘要

目的

制定反映择期全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)治疗骨关节炎(OA)前后康复护理最低可接受标准的质量指标(QIs)。

方法

在高质量证据的指导下,采用改良的 RAND-UCLA Delphi 方法,由 18 名加拿大临床医生、研究人员和患者组成的小组对 81 项拟议的 QIs(40 项用于 THA,42 项用于 TKA)进行了评估,这些 QIs 涉及择期 THA 和 TKA 前后的康复问题。小组成员通过两轮在线评分,对 QIs 的重要性和有效性进行 9 分制的 Likert 评分,并穿插一个有主持人的匿名在线讨论论坛。那些重要性和有效性的中位数评分≥7 分,且基于中位数评分的百分位区间调整后的对称性无分歧的 QIs 被纳入最终的 QIs 集。

结果

来自七个省和不同实践环境的 15 名小组成员完成了 Delphi 流程。在 81 项外加一项 QIs(共计 82 项)中,有 67 项(82%)被评为重要且有效(THA 为 31 项,TKA 为 36 项)。THA 接受了 14 项术前、6 项急性和 8 项术后 QIs;TKA 接受了 16 项术前、10 项急性和 8 项术后指标。三项“跨连续体”QIs 中有两项被认为适用于两种手术。

结论

这是第一个用于衡量、报告和比较接受 THA/TKA 手术前后康复护理质量的 QIs。在广泛应用于临床环境并用于评估护理差距之前,将进一步对这些 QIs 的可靠性和可行性进行测试。

相似文献

1
Development of quality indicators for hip and knee arthroplasty rehabilitation.髋关节和膝关节置换康复的质量指标制定。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Mar;26(3):370-382. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Dec 30.
2
Quality indicators in primary elective total hip and knee arthroplasty.原发性选择性全髋关节和膝关节置换术的质量指标。
Int Orthop. 2023 Mar;47(3):647-658. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05665-x. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
3
Expert consensus on best practices for post-acute rehabilitation after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a Canada and United States Delphi study.全髋关节和膝关节置换术后康复的最佳实践专家共识:加拿大和美国的德尔菲研究。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Mar;66(3):411-23. doi: 10.1002/acr.22164.
4
Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.与髋或膝关节骨关节炎相比,手术治疗局限性腰椎椎管狭窄症的比较结果和成本效用:第 2 部分——估计终生增量成本效用比。
Spine J. 2014 Feb 1;14(2):244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
5
Clinical outcome and cost effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation after total hip and knee arthroplasty. A multi-centre cohort benchmarking study between nine rehabilitation departments in Rhineland-Palatinate (Western Germany).全髋关节和膝关节置换术后住院康复的临床结局及成本效益。德国西部莱茵兰-普法尔茨州九个康复科室之间的多中心队列基准研究。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Dec;51(6):803-13. Epub 2015 May 26.
6
Development of the Italian version of the High-Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS-I) following hip and knee total arthroplasty: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change.髋关节和膝关节全关节置换术后意大利版高活动度关节成形术评分(HAAS-I)的研制:跨文化调适、信度、效度及对变化的敏感性
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Apr 11;13(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0782-5.
7
Patient and health professional views on rehabilitation practices and outcomes following total hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis:a focus group study.患者和健康专业人员对骨关节炎全髋关节和膝关节置换术后康复实践和结果的看法:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 May 11;10:119. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-119.
8
Quality Indicators of Primary Care Provider Engagement in Nursing Home Care.初级保健提供者参与养老院护理的质量指标。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Oct;19(10):824-832. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.08.001.
9
Results of total joint arthroplasty and joint preserving surgery in younger patients evaluated by alternative outcome measures.采用替代结局指标评估年轻患者全关节置换术和保关节手术的结果。
Dan Med J. 2014 Apr;61(4):B4836.
10
Comparative outcomes and cost-utility after surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee--part 1: long-term change in health-related quality of life.与髋或膝关节骨关节炎相比,腰椎局灶性狭窄症的手术治疗的比较结果和成本-效用——第 1 部分:健康相关生活质量的长期变化。
Spine J. 2014 Feb 1;14(2):234-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing Cancer Quality of Care Indicators to Quantify the Impact of a Global Destabilization of the Care System (COLLAT-COVID).制定癌症护理质量指标以量化全球护理系统不稳定(COLLAT-COVID)的影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 16;17(10):1680. doi: 10.3390/cancers17101680.
2
Quality indicators for the rehabilitation before and after total knee arthroplasty in Japan: a modified Delphi method and practice test.日本全膝关节置换术前后康复的质量指标:一种改良德尔菲法及实践测试
Arthroplasty. 2025 Mar 6;7(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s42836-024-00297-5.
3
A multidisciplinary Delphi consensus to define evidence-based quality indicators for diabetic foot ulcer care.
多学科德尔菲共识定义糖尿病足溃疡护理的循证质量指标。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Apr 3;34(2):253-259. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad235.
4
Effectiveness of eHealth Tools for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.电子健康工具用于髋关节和膝关节置换术的有效性:一项系统评价
Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Aug 26;2:696019. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.696019. eCollection 2021.
5
Content and delivery of pre-operative interventions for patients undergoing total knee replacement: a rapid review.全膝关节置换术患者术前干预的内容和实施:快速综述。
Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 2;11(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02019-x.
6
Planning and Reporting Effective Web-Based RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Panels: Literature Review and Preliminary Recommendations.规划和报告有效的基于网络的 RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法小组:文献回顾和初步建议。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 26;24(8):e33898. doi: 10.2196/33898.
7
A practice test and selection of a core set of outcome-based quality indicators in Dutch primary care physical therapy for patients with COPD: a cohort study.一项针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的荷兰初级保健物理治疗实践测试及基于结果的核心质量指标选择:一项队列研究。
ERJ Open Res. 2022 Aug 15;8(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00008-2022. eCollection 2022 Jul.
8
Recovery and the use of postoperative physical therapy after total hip or knee replacement.全髋关节或膝关节置换术后的康复和术后物理治疗的应用。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jul 13;23(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05429-z.
9
Phase 3 Trials of Enhanced Versus Usual Care Physical Therapy for Patients at Risk of Poor Outcome Following Knee Arthroplasty: A Perspective on Meaning and a Way Forward.膝关节置换术后预后不良风险患者增强型与常规物理治疗的 3 期临床试验:意义的视角与前进的道路。
Phys Ther. 2021 Nov 1;101(11). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab186.
10
The Hip Instructional Prehabilitation Program for Enhanced Recovery (HIPPER) as an eHealth Approach to Presurgical Hip Replacement Education: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.用于增强恢复的髋关节术前康复指导计划(HIPPER):一种用于术前髋关节置换教育的电子健康方法:随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jul 6;10(7):e29322. doi: 10.2196/29322.