Suppr超能文献

手部消毒实践:一项教育干预措施的影响

Hand disinfectant practice: the impact of an education intervention.

作者信息

Sjöberg Maria, Eriksson Mats

机构信息

Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Orebro University Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

Open Nurs J. 2010 Feb 23;4:20-4. doi: 10.2174/1874434601004010020.

Abstract

The primary hypothesis of this study was that a lecture on basic hygiene routines could be associated with an increase in the use of disinfectant for hand hygiene. A secondary hypothesis was that the lecture could positively affect the staff's knowledge of and attitudes toward basic hygiene routines.A quasi-experimental design including one ward of the department of orthopedics in a Swedish university hospital was adopted.During the pre-intervention test period the consumption of hand disinfectant was measured for 30 days and a questionnaire was distributed to all staff. The hospital hygiene nurse subsequently provided a lecture on basic hygiene routines to all employees on the ward. During the post-intervention test period the hand disinfectant consumption was measured for another 30 days, and the questionnaire was distributed once again. A follow-up measurement was performed 9 months after the intervention.After the lecture on hygiene routines, the consumption of hand disinfectant increased by 93%. Nine months after the intervention, the consumption was still 21% higher than before the intervention. The result of the questionnaire showed that the employees considered themselves applying the disinfectant more thoroughly after the intervention. Some employees changed their perspective on basic hygiene routines after the lecture and stopped using watches and private clothes at work.Our findings suggest that a single education session, a hygiene lecture, could be a simple and cost-effective method to increase the use of hand disinfectant, thereby reducing the number of nosocomial infections on the wards.

摘要

本研究的主要假设是,关于基本卫生习惯的讲座可能与手部卫生消毒剂使用量的增加有关。次要假设是,该讲座可对工作人员关于基本卫生习惯的知识和态度产生积极影响。采用了一种准实验设计,纳入了瑞典一家大学医院骨科的一个病房。在干预前测试期,测量了30天的手部消毒剂消耗量,并向所有工作人员发放了一份问卷。随后,医院卫生护士为病房的所有员工提供了一次关于基本卫生习惯的讲座。在干预后测试期,又测量了30天的手部消毒剂消耗量,并再次发放问卷。在干预9个月后进行了一次随访测量。卫生习惯讲座后,手部消毒剂的消耗量增加了93%。干预9个月后,消耗量仍比干预前高出21%。问卷结果显示,员工们认为干预后他们使用消毒剂更加彻底。一些员工在讲座后改变了对基本卫生习惯的看法,不再在工作时戴手表和穿便服。我们的研究结果表明,单次教育课程,即一次卫生讲座,可能是一种简单且具有成本效益的方法,可增加手部消毒剂的使用,从而减少病房内医院感染的数量。

相似文献

1
Hand disinfectant practice: the impact of an education intervention.
Open Nurs J. 2010 Feb 23;4:20-4. doi: 10.2174/1874434601004010020.
4
[What can public health departments do to improve hand hygiene in hospitals?].
Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Jul;70(7):415-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1080931.
5
[Reduction of Visitor- and Staff-Associated Risk of Infection by Complex Intervention in the Department of Feto-Maternal Medicine].
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2020 Oct;224(5):297-305. doi: 10.1055/a-1226-7257. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
6
Implementation of the WHO hand hygiene strategy in Faranah regional hospital, Guinea.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 May 14;9(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00723-8.
8
[Improved hand hygiene through simple interventions].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007 Mar 29;127(7):861-3.
9
Microbiological efficacy and tolerability of a new, non-alcohol-based hand disinfectant.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Jul;30(7):685-90. doi: 10.1086/598239.
10
Do we need a pandemic to improve hygiene routines in the ambulance service? A cross-sectional study.
Int Emerg Nurs. 2022 May;62:101171. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2022.101171. Epub 2022 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Post-Sepsis Syndrome: How Can Clinicians Help?
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Sep 29;16:6493-6511. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S390947. eCollection 2023.
2
Baseline assessment of hand hygiene knowledge perception: An observational study at a newly set up teaching hospital.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 May 31;9(5):2460-2464. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_20_20. eCollection 2020 May.
4
Hand hygiene compliance and associated factors among health care providers in Central Gondar zone public primary hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Nov 26;8:190. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0634-z. eCollection 2019.
5
Hand hygiene: back to the basics of infection control.
Indian J Med Res. 2011 Nov;134(5):611-20. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.90985.

本文引用的文献

1
A review of hand-washing techniques in primary care and community settings.
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Mar;18(6):786-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02546.x.
2
Hygienic hand washing among nursing students in Turkey.
Appl Nurs Res. 2008 Nov;21(4):207-11. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2006.12.001.
3
Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD000409. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000409.pub2.
5
[Improved hand hygiene through simple interventions].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007 Mar 29;127(7):861-3.
6
Evaluating handwashing technique. 1985.
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Jan;53(1):46-50; discussion 50-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03666.x.
7
Health care workers' hand decontamination practices: an Irish study.
Clin Nurs Res. 2006 Feb;15(1):6-26. doi: 10.1177/1054773805282445.
9
European norms in hand hygiene.
J Hosp Infect. 2004 Apr;56 Suppl 2:S6-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2003.12.024.
10
Infection control - a problem for patient safety.
N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 13;348(7):651-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr020557.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验