University Clinic of Epileptology, University of Bonn, Sigmund Freud Strasse 25, Bonn, Germany.
Epilepsy Behav. 2010 May;18(1-2):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.02.011. Epub 2010 May 13.
This open-label, non-interventional, controlled surveillance study evaluated the cognitive outcome of patients administered levetiracetam (LEV) or carbamazepine (CBZ) monotherapy as primary treatment or as substitution for previous treatment. Executive functions, verbal memory, and subjective ratings were assessed before and 6 months after initiation of LEV or CBZ monotherapy. Analyses included 498 patients: 370 received LEV (63% pretreated), and 128 CBZ (34% pretreated). Mostly because of the substitution condition, the seizure freedom rate was slightly higher with LEV as opposed to CBZ (78% vs 69%). Almost all cognitive measures improved with LEV but not with CBZ, and repeated-measures MANOVA did not indicate seizure control or pretreatment as decisive with respect to cognitive change. With LEV, executive functions improved in 15% and deteriorated in 5% of patients; the opposite pattern was seen under CBZ (improvement with LEV OR=2.3, deterioration with CBZ OR=3.4). The findings suggest a mild but definitely superior cognitive outcome with LEV as opposed to CBZ monotherapy.
这项开放性、非干预性、对照监测研究评估了左乙拉西坦(LEV)或卡马西平(CBZ)单药治疗作为初始治疗或替代先前治疗的患者的认知结局。在开始 LEV 或 CBZ 单药治疗之前和 6 个月后,评估了执行功能、言语记忆和主观评分。分析包括 498 名患者:370 名接受 LEV(63%预处理),128 名接受 CBZ(34%预处理)。由于替代条件,LEV 的无癫痫发作率略高于 CBZ(78%比 69%)。几乎所有认知测量指标均随 LEV 而改善,但随 CBZ 而无改善,重复测量 MANOVA 并未表明癫痫控制或预处理对认知变化有决定性影响。在 LEV 组中,15%的患者执行功能改善,5%的患者执行功能恶化;而在 CBZ 组中则相反(LEV 的改善 OR=2.3,CBZ 的恶化 OR=3.4)。这些发现表明,与 CBZ 单药治疗相比,LEV 具有轻度但明显更优的认知结局。