School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010 Dec;2(12):a002196. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a002196. Epub 2010 May 12.
Since the structure of DNA was elucidated more than 50 years ago, Watson-Crick base pairing has been widely speculated to be the likely mode of both information storage and transfer in the earliest genetic polymers. The discovery of catalytic RNA molecules subsequently provided support for the hypothesis that RNA was perhaps even the first polymer of life. However, the de novo synthesis of RNA using only plausible prebiotic chemistry has proven difficult, to say the least. Experimental investigations, made possible by the application of synthetic and physical organic chemistry, have now provided evidence that the nucleobases (A, G, C, and T/U), the trifunctional moiety ([deoxy]ribose), and the linkage chemistry (phosphate esters) of contemporary nucleic acids may be optimally suited for their present roles-a situation that suggests refinement by evolution. Here, we consider studies of variations in these three distinct components of nucleic acids with regard to the question: Is RNA, as is generally acknowledged of DNA, the product of evolution? If so, what chemical and structural features might have been more likely and advantageous for a proto-RNA?
自 50 多年前 DNA 结构被阐明以来,人们广泛推测 Watson-Crick 碱基配对可能是最早遗传聚合物中信息存储和传递的模式。随后催化 RNA 分子的发现为 RNA 可能甚至是生命的第一种聚合物的假说提供了支持。然而,仅使用合理的前生物化学合成 RNA 已被证明是困难的,可以说是非常困难。通过应用合成和物理有机化学进行的实验研究现在提供了证据,表明核碱基(A、G、C 和 T/U)、三功能部分([脱氧]核糖)和当代核酸的连接化学(磷酸酯)可能最适合它们目前的作用——这种情况表明进化的改进。在这里,我们考虑了对核酸这三个不同成分的变化的研究,以回答以下问题:RNA 是否像人们普遍认为的 DNA 一样,是进化的产物?如果是这样,对于原始 RNA,哪些化学和结构特征更有可能且更有利?