Jones A S, Johnson M S, Nagy T R
Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Int J Body Compos Res. 2009;7(2):67-72.
The aim of this study was to assess the precision and accuracy of a quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) instrument for measuring body composition in live, non-anesthetized mice. METHODS: Forty-eight mice of varying strains, ages and body weights (15.3 to 50.2g) were scanned three times each in the QMR instrument. Animals were killed and chemical carcass analysis performed for comparison. Precision was assessed as the coefficient of variation (CV) for the triplicate scans and accuracy was determined by comparing the first QMR data with the chemical analysis. Prediction equations were generated by linear regression analysis and used in a cross-validation study in which 26 mice were scanned once each, killed, and chemical carcass analysis performed. RESULTS: The mean CV was 1.58% for fat mass (FM) and 0.78% for lean-tissue mass (LTM). QMR significantly (P<0.01) overestimated FM (7.76±5.93 vs. 6.03±5.17g) and underestimated LTM (20.73±6.19 vs. 22.48±6.75g) when compared with chemical carcass analysis. A strong relationship between QMR and chemical data (r(2)=0.99 and r(2)=0.97 for fat and LTM respectively; P<0.0001) allowed for the generation of correction equations that were applied to QMR data in the cross-validation study. There was no significant difference between data predicted from QMR and chemical carcass data for FM and LTM (P=0.15 and 0.10 respectively). CONCLUSION: The QMR instrument showed excellent precision and data was highly correlated with chemical carcass analysis. This combined with QMR's speed for whole animal analysis (95 seconds) make it a highly feasible and useful method for the determination of body composition in live, non-anesthetized mice.
本研究旨在评估一种定量磁共振(QMR)仪器在测量活的、未麻醉小鼠身体成分时的精密度和准确性。方法:48只不同品系、年龄和体重(15.3至50.2克)的小鼠在QMR仪器中各扫描三次。处死动物并进行化学胴体分析以作比较。精密度以三次重复扫描的变异系数(CV)评估,准确性通过将首次QMR数据与化学分析结果比较来确定。通过线性回归分析生成预测方程,并用于交叉验证研究,其中26只小鼠各扫描一次,处死并进行化学胴体分析。结果:脂肪量(FM)的平均CV为1.58%,瘦组织量(LTM)的平均CV为0.78%。与化学胴体分析相比,QMR显著高估了FM(7.76±5.93克对6.03±5.17克,P<0.01),低估了LTM(20.73±6.19克对22.48±6.75克)。QMR与化学数据之间存在很强的相关性(脂肪和LTM的r²分别为0.99和0.97;P<0.0001),这使得能够生成校正方程,并应用于交叉验证研究中的QMR数据。QMR预测的数据与化学胴体数据在FM和LTM方面无显著差异(P分别为0.15和0.10)。结论:QMR仪器显示出出色的精密度,数据与化学胴体分析高度相关。这与QMR对全动物分析的速度(95秒)相结合,使其成为测定活的、未麻醉小鼠身体成分的一种高度可行且有用的方法。