Johnson M S, Smith D L, Nagy T R
Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Int J Body Compos Res. 2009 Sep;7(3):99-107.
To validate the use of quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) to measure fat and lean mass in conscious rats. METHODS: Fifty Osborne-Mendel rats (249-770 g) were scanned using the Echo Medical 2 MHz body composition analyzer. Each rat was scanned under six settings (three acquisition times, with and without determination of total water). Precision was determined by the calculated coefficient of variation (CV) of three consecutive scans. Accuracy was determined by comparing the first scan to chemical carcass analysis and analyzed by paired t-tests and least-squares regression analyses. Twenty-five rats were used in the validation study, and 25 in the cross-validation study. RESULTS: The precision for fat, lean and water at all settings was <1%. QMR significantly overestimated fat (5%; P<0.0001), and underestimated both lean (12.5%; P<0.0001) and total water (~5.5%; P<0.0001). All QMR measures were significantly correlated with carcass measures (r(2)>0.99; P<0.0001). Using prediction equations from the validation study with the cross-validation rats, there were no significant differences between QMR fat and carcass fat at any setting (P>0.400). For four of the six QMR settings, there were no significant differences between QMR and carcass lean (P>0.05). For total water, all QMR settings were significantly different than carcass (P<0.05), but only by ~1%. CONCLUSIONS: QMR showed excellent precision for the determination of fat, lean and water. Despite overestimating fat and underestimating lean and water, all were highly related to carcass values. When tested in the cross-validation group, QMR fat could be accurately predicted at all settings; however, lean mass (two settings) and water were still slightly different (less than 1%).
验证定量磁共振(QMR)用于测量清醒大鼠脂肪和瘦体重的可行性。方法:使用Echo Medical 2 MHz体成分分析仪对50只奥斯本-孟德尔大鼠(体重249 - 770克)进行扫描。每只大鼠在六种设置下进行扫描(三个采集时间,分别测定和不测定总水量)。通过计算连续三次扫描的变异系数(CV)来确定精密度。通过将第一次扫描结果与化学尸体分析结果进行比较来确定准确度,并采用配对t检验和最小二乘回归分析进行分析。25只大鼠用于验证研究,25只用于交叉验证研究。结果:所有设置下脂肪、瘦体重和水的精密度均<1%。QMR显著高估了脂肪(约5%;P<0.0001),并低估了瘦体重(约12.5%;P<0.0001)和总水量(约5.5%;P<0.0001)。所有QMR测量值与尸体测量值均显著相关(r²>0.99;P<0.0001)。使用验证研究中的预测方程对交叉验证大鼠进行分析,在任何设置下,QMR脂肪与尸体脂肪之间均无显著差异(P>0.400)。在六种QMR设置中的四种设置下,QMR与尸体瘦体重之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。对于总水量,所有QMR设置与尸体总水量均有显著差异(P<0.05),但仅相差约1%。结论:QMR在测定脂肪、瘦体重和水方面显示出优异的精密度。尽管高估了脂肪,低估了瘦体重和水,但所有测量值与尸体值均高度相关。在交叉验证组中进行测试时,所有设置下的QMR脂肪均可准确预测;然而,瘦体重(两种设置)和水仍存在轻微差异(小于1%)。