RIVM/SEC Anthonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Oct;58(1):131-44. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.05.002. Epub 2010 May 12.
The Integrated Assessment Scheme (IAS) defines weight factors for each piece of toxicological information under REACH in an Integrated Testing Strategy. This IAS is illustrated on skin irritation for Classification and Labelling (C&L) for five substances and using mostly (Q)SAR models. The models are the BfR Rulebase, Derek for Windows and TOPKAT, read across and pH-rules. The weight factors derived in the IAS show that for peracetic-acid and pentabromodiphenylether the C&L decision could be easily made. For bisphenol A additional information on read across was used to finalise a decision on C&L, while for methylphenyl-diisocyanate additional expert judgement was needed. For allylheptanoate only the TOPKAT prediction was in the applicability domain, which was insufficient on its own. Therefore, other non guideline testing information was used and in vitro testing results. The above examples on skin irritation information show how the IAS can aid in the decision making process and how it adds to the ToxRTool and the ITS of Hoffmann et al. on the same endpoint and similar methods.
综合评估方案 (IAS) 在 REACH 下的综合测试策略中为每一条毒理学信息定义了权重因素。该 IAS 以五种物质的皮肤刺激分类和标签 (C&L) 为例,并主要使用了 (Q)SAR 模型。这些模型包括 BfR Rulebase、Derek for Windows 和 TOPKAT、read across 和 pH-rules。IAS 中得出的权重因素表明,对于过氧乙酸和五溴二苯醚,可以轻松做出 C&L 决策。对于双酚 A,使用了 read across 的额外信息来最终确定 C&L 决策,而对于甲基苯基二异氰酸酯,则需要额外的专家判断。对于烯丙基庚酸酯,只有 TOPKAT 预测在适用性域内,这本身是不够的。因此,使用了其他非指南测试信息和体外测试结果。上述皮肤刺激信息的例子展示了 IAS 如何帮助决策过程,以及它如何补充 Hoffmann 等人在相同终点和类似方法上的 ToxRTool 和 ITS。