Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 May;24(4):701-24. doi: 10.1080/13854040903482863.
Clinical research interest in the symptom reporting validity scale currently known as the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) Symptom Validity Scale (FBS) has continued to be strong, with multiple new publications annually in peer-reviewed journals that publish psychological and neuropsychological assessment research. Related to this growth in relevant literature, the present study was conducted to update the Nelson, Sweet, and Demakis (2006b) FBS meta-analysis. A total of 83 FBS studies (43 new studies) were identified, and 32 (38.5%) met inclusion criteria. Analyses were conducted on a pooled sample of 2218 over-reporting and 3123 comparison participants. Large omnibus effect sizes were observed for FBS, Obvious-Subtle (O-S), and the Dissimulation Scale-Revised (Dsr2) scales. Moderate effect sizes were observed for the following scales: Back Infrequency (Fb), Gough's F-K, Infrequency (F), Infrequency Psychopathology (Fp), and Dissimulation (Ds2). Moderator analyses illustrate that relative to the F-family scales, FBS exhibited larger effect sizes when (1) effort is known to be insufficient and (2) evaluation is conducted in the context of traumatic brain injury. Overall, current results summarize an extensive literature that continues to support use of FBS in forensic neuropsychology practice.
目前,临床研究对明尼苏达多项人格测验-2 症状报告有效性量表(MMPI-2 SVS),即 FBS 的兴趣浓厚,每年都有大量新的同行评审期刊出版物发表关于心理和神经心理评估研究的文章。与相关文献的增长相关,本研究旨在更新 Nelson、Sweet 和 Demakis(2006b)的 FBS 荟萃分析。共确定了 83 项 FBS 研究(43 项新研究),其中 32 项(38.5%)符合纳入标准。对 2218 名过度报告者和 3123 名对照组参与者的汇总样本进行了分析。FBS、明显-微妙(O-S)和伪装量表修订版(Dsr2)的综合效应大小较大。以下量表的效应大小适中:反向频数(Fb)、Gough 的 F-K、频数(F)、频数精神病理学(Fp)和伪装(Ds2)。 调节分析表明,与 F 家族量表相比,当(1)已知努力不足,(2)评估在创伤性脑损伤的背景下进行时,FBS 表现出更大的效应大小。总的来说,目前的结果总结了一个广泛的文献,该文献继续支持 FBS 在法医神经心理学实践中的应用。