Neurobehavioral Associates, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 Jun;25(4):274-84. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acq018. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
The Response Bias Scale (RBS) has been found to be a better predictor of over-reported memory complaints than Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) F, Back Infrequency (Fb), Infrequency-Psychopathology (Fp), and FBS scales. The MMPI-2-Restructured Form (RF) validity scales were designed to meet or exceed the sensitivity of their MMPI-2 counterparts to symptom over-reporting. This study examined the incremental validity of MMPI-2-RF validity scales and RBS in assessing memory complaints. The MMPI-2-RF over-reporting validity scales were more strongly associated with mean Memory Complaints Inventory scores than their MMPI-2 counterparts (d = 0.22 to 0.49). RBS showed the strongest relationship with memory complaints. Regression analyses demonstrated the incremental validity of the MMPI-2-RF Infrequent Responses, Infrequent Psychopathology Responses, Infrequent Somatic Responses, and FBS-r scales relative to MMPI-2 F, Fp, and FBS in predicting memory complaints. This is consistent with the development objectives of the MMPI-2-RF validity scales as more efficient and sensitive measures of symptom over-reporting.
反应偏差量表 (RBS) 被发现比明尼苏达多项人格测验-2 (MMPI-2) F、反向不频度 (Fb)、不频度-精神病理学 (Fp) 和 FBS 量表更能预测过度报告的记忆主诉。MMPI-2 重构形式 (RF) 效度量表的设计旨在达到或超过其 MMPI-2 对应量表对症状过度报告的敏感性。本研究考察了 MMPI-2-RF 效度量表和 RBS 在评估记忆主诉方面的增量效度。MMPI-2-RF 过度报告效度量表与平均记忆主诉量表评分的相关性强于其 MMPI-2 对应量表 (d = 0.22 至 0.49)。RBS 与记忆主诉的关系最强。回归分析表明,MMPI-2-RF 不频繁反应、不频繁精神病理学反应、不频繁躯体反应和 FBS-r 量表相对于 MMPI-2 F、Fp 和 FBS 在预测记忆主诉方面具有增量效度。这与 MMPI-2-RF 效度量表的开发目标一致,即作为更有效和敏感的症状过度报告衡量标准。