Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, United States.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Jul;30(5):582-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.010. Epub 2010 May 15.
Within the past 20 years, depression research has given increasing consideration to the possibility of complex and reciprocal relations between stress and depression. Not only does stress increase risk for depression (i.e., a stress exposure model of depression), but depression, or depressogenic vulnerabilities, in turn, also increases susceptibility to stressful events that are at least in part influenced by the individual (i.e., stress generation; Hammen, 1991). The present review provides a systematic examination of the stress generation literature to date, with specific focus given to depression and depressogenic risk factors (i.e., past stress, negative cognitive styles, and personality and interpersonal vulnerabilities) as predictors of the stress generation effect, as well as gender differences in stress generation, the sequelae of generated stress, and the relative specificity of this phenomenon to depression. The research thus far appears most consistent in supporting the role of depression in predicting generated stress, although more research is still required. In addition to highlighting these findings, methodological limitations and conceptual gaps in the literature are discussed with the view of informing future research in this area.
在过去的 20 年里,抑郁研究越来越关注压力和抑郁之间可能存在的复杂和相互关系。压力不仅会增加患抑郁症的风险(即抑郁症的压力暴露模型),而且抑郁症或抑郁易感性反过来也会增加对至少部分受个体影响的应激事件的易感性(即应激产生;Hammen,1991)。本综述对迄今为止的应激产生文献进行了系统的考察,特别关注抑郁症和抑郁风险因素(即过去的压力、消极的认知方式以及个性和人际脆弱性)作为应激产生效应的预测因素,以及应激产生中的性别差异、产生的应激的后果,以及这种现象对抑郁症的相对特异性。迄今为止的研究似乎最一致地支持抑郁症在预测产生的压力方面的作用,尽管还需要更多的研究。除了强调这些发现之外,还讨论了文献中的方法学限制和概念差距,以期为该领域的未来研究提供信息。