Original Gleason system versus 2005 ISUP modified Gleason system: the importance of indicating which system is used in the patient's pathology and clinical reports.

作者信息

Montironi Rodolfo, Cheng Liang, Lopez-Beltran Antonio, Scarpelli Marina, Mazzucchelli Roberta, Mikuz Gregor, Kirkali Ziya, Montorsi Francesco

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2010 Sep;58(3):369-73. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.028. Epub 2010 May 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.028

PMID:20478652

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Original Gleason system versus 2005 ISUP modified Gleason system: the importance of indicating which system is used in the patient's pathology and clinical reports.

Eur Urol. 2010 Sep;58(3):369-73. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.028. Epub 2010 May 8.

Re: Rodolfo Montironi, Liang Cheng, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, et al. Original Gleason system versus 2005 ISUP modified Gleason system: the importance of indicating which system is used in the patient's pathology and clinical reports. Eur Urol 2010;58:369-73.

Eur Urol. 2011 Mar;59(3):e5-6; author reply e7-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.11.029. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus on Gleason grading in contemporary practice.2005 年国际泌尿病理学会（ISUP）共识对当代 Gleason 分级实践的影响。

Histopathology. 2009 Oct;55(4):384-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03405.x.

Prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis by the ratio of cathepsin B to stefin A in patients with prostate carcinoma.组织蛋白酶B与丝抑素A的比值对前列腺癌患者盆腔淋巴结转移的预测作用

Cancer. 2002 Jun 15;94(12):3141-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10604.

Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.2005年国际泌尿病理学会Gleason分级系统在前列腺穿刺活检及前列腺根治性切除标本中的应用价值。

BJU Int. 2009 May;103(9):1190-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08197.x. Epub 2008 Dec 8.

[Discrepancies between Japanese general rules of prostatic cancer and Gleason grading system].

Nihon Rinsho. 2000 Jul;58 Suppl:413-5.

Will the modification of the Gleason grading system affect the urology practice?Gleason分级系统的修改会影响泌尿外科的临床实践吗？

Int J Surg Pathol. 2010 Aug;18(4):248-54. doi: 10.1177/1066896909346272. Epub 2009 Sep 30.

Update on the Gleason grading system for prostate cancer: results of an international consensus conference of urologic pathologists.前列腺癌Gleason分级系统的最新进展：泌尿病理学家国际共识会议的结果

Adv Anat Pathol. 2006 Jan;13(1):57-9. doi: 10.1097/01.pap.0000202017.78917.18.

The case for modifying the Gleason grading system.修改 Gleason 分级系统的理由。

BJU Int. 2007 Oct;100(4):725-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07036.x. Epub 2007 Jun 8.

Gleason scoring: a comparison of classical and modified (international society of urological pathology) criteria using nadir PSA as a clinical end point.格里森评分：以 PSA 最低值为临床终点，比较经典和改良（国际泌尿病理学会）标准。

Pathology. 2010 Jun;42(4):339-43. doi: 10.3109/00313021003787924.

引用本文的文献

Targeting the cancer lesion, not the whole prostate.针对癌症病灶，而非整个前列腺。

Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Jun;9(3):1518-1525. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.09.12.

The new ISUP 2014/WHO 2016 prostate cancer grade group system: first résumé 5 years after introduction and systemic review of the literature.新 ISUP 2014/WHO 2016 前列腺癌分级系统：介绍 5 年后的初步总结和文献系统评价。

World J Urol. 2020 Mar;38(3):657-662. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02744-4. Epub 2019 Apr 2.

Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: A Grading from Gleason to the New Grade-Group System: A Historical and Critical Review.前列腺腺癌：从 Gleason 分级到新的分级组系统的分级：历史与批判性综述

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Mar 26;20(3):661-666. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.3.661.

Active surveillance for prostate and thyroid cancers: evolution in clinical paradigms and lessons learned.前列腺癌和甲状腺癌的主动监测：临床范例的演变和经验教训。

Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar;16(3):168-184. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0116-x.

Predicting Prostate Cancer Progression as a Function of ETS-related Gene Status, Race, and Obesity in a Longitudinal Patient Cohort.基于 ETS 相关基因状态、种族和肥胖情况预测纵向患者队列中前列腺癌的进展。

Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Dec;4(6):818-824. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Mar 11.

Novel concepts for risk stratification in prostate cancer.前列腺癌风险分层的新概念。

J Clin Urol. 2016 Dec;9(2 Suppl):18-23. doi: 10.1177/2051415816673502. Epub 2016 Dec 1.

Does true Gleason pattern 3 merit its cancer descriptor?真正的 Gleason 模式 3 是否值得使用癌症描述符？

Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Sep;13(9):541-8. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.141. Epub 2016 Aug 17.

Prostate cancer: Effects of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on oncological outcome.

Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Apr;12(4):188-9. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.370. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

Significant association between the Axin2 rs2240308 single nucleotide polymorphism and the incidence of prostate cancer.Axin2基因rs2240308单核苷酸多态性与前列腺癌发病率之间存在显著关联。

Oncol Lett. 2014 Aug;8(2):789-794. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2177. Epub 2014 May 26.

Gleason grade progression is uncommon.格里森分级进展不常见。

Cancer Res. 2013 Aug 15;73(16):5163-8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0427.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验