Kirk Pia Chatterjee, Fitchie James G, Phillips Scott M, Puckett Aaron D
Department of Care Planning and Restorative Services, University of Mississippi School of Dentistry in Jackson, USA.
Gen Dent. 2010 May-Jun;58(3):e104-9.
This study sought to compare and rank the in vitro microleakage behavior of four self-etching adhesive systems to determine any differences in their marginal sealing ability. Using a coarse rounded diamond wheel, Class V cavities were prepared at the facial or lingual cementoenamel junction (CEJ) of 40 recently extracted human third molars. All preparations had incisal margins in enamel and gingival margins in dentin. Ten randomly selected teeth were restored with one of four different adhesive systems; all teeth received the same composite material. The teeth were stored in distilled water (37 degrees C) for four weeks, thermocycled between 4 degrees C and 58 degrees C for 100 cycles, treated with 45Ca radioisotope, sectioned, and placed on radiographic film to produce autoradiographs. The degree of microleakage was scored separately at the enamel (incisal) and dentin (gingival) margins, and the results were compared using nonparametric statistical methods. The analysis found statistically significant differences in the degree of microleakage between the materials used at both the dentin and enamel margins.
本研究旨在比较并排序四种自酸蚀粘结系统的体外微渗漏行为,以确定它们边缘封闭能力的差异。使用粗圆形金刚砂轮,在40颗近期拔除的人类第三磨牙的颊侧或舌侧牙釉质牙骨质界(CEJ)制备V类洞。所有制备的洞在釉质中有切缘,在牙本质中有龈缘。随机选择10颗牙齿,用四种不同粘结系统之一进行修复;所有牙齿均使用相同的复合材料。将牙齿置于蒸馏水(37℃)中保存四周,在4℃至58℃之间进行100次热循环,用45Ca放射性同位素处理,切片,并置于X线胶片上以产生放射自显影片。分别在釉质(切缘)和牙本质(龈缘)边缘对微渗漏程度进行评分,并使用非参数统计方法比较结果。分析发现,在牙本质和釉质边缘使用的材料之间,微渗漏程度存在统计学上的显著差异。