Reeves G W, Fitchie J G, Hembree J H, Puckett A D
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson 39216, USA.
Oper Dent. 1995 Nov-Dec;20(6):230-5.
The objective of this study was twofold: to evaluate the microleakage behavior of three dentin bonding systems and to determine if bovine teeth are comparable substrates to human teeth when studying the microleakage of various materials. The materials evaluated were Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive, Prisma Universal Bond 3, and All-Bond 2. All three bonding systems were used in combination with Prisma APH hybrid composite for comparison of microleakage behavior. Sixty class 5 preparations were cut at the cementoenamel junction for groups containing 30 human and 30 bovine teeth. A 1 mm 45 degree bevel was placed at the enamel margin. Teeth were grouped according to the dentin bonding system used and then restored according to the manufacturer's directions. After restoration, the teeth from each group were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 3 days. The teeth were then thermocycled between 4 degrees C and 58 degrees C for 100 cycles and returned to distilled water at 37 degrees C for an additional 4 days. The teeth were then sealed with nail polish up to 1 mm from the margins of the restoration and placed in 45Ca isotope for 2 hours. The teeth were then sectioned and placed on x-ray film to produce autoradiographs. Microleakage was evaluated for the enamel and dentin margins separately using the following scale: 0 = no leakage, 1 = penetration of isotope to less than 1/2 the distance to the axial wall, 2 = penetration of isotope greater than 1/2 of the distance to the axial wall but short of the axial wall, and 3 = penetration of isotope to the axial wall or beyond. The materials were compared to each other using the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The gingival margins were compared to the incisal margins for all materials. No statistically significant differences in microleakage were revealed between the incisal and gingival location for human substrates, but there was statistically significant greater gingival microleakage for bovine substrates. All-Bond 2 leaked significantly more than Scotchbond Multi-Purpose for human substrates at the incisal margin. All-Bond 2 had significantly more microleakage than Prisma Universal Bond 3 at both dentin and enamel margins for the bovine substrate. There were no statistically significant differences in microleakage among the bonding systems for the human substrate. No statistically significant differences between the microleakage behavior of human and bovine substrates were found. These results support the use of bovine teeth for in vitro microleakage studies.
