Suppr超能文献

吸烟对 25-羟维生素 D 血清水平的影响取决于所采用的检测方法。

Effect of smoking on the serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D depends on the assay employed.

机构信息

Medical Clinic, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

Eur J Endocrinol. 2010 Aug;163(2):339-48. doi: 10.1530/EJE-10-0150. Epub 2010 May 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Because we found higher serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels among smokers than among non-smokers with analyses using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) from Roche, the purpose of the present study was to examine whether this difference between smokers and non-smokers was maintained using other serum 25(OH)D assays.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional population-based study on 6932 participants from the Tromsø study, 1994-1995, and one validation study comparing six different serum 25(OH)D assays in 53 non-smokers and 54 smokers were performed.

METHODS

The association between smoking, season and serum 25(OH)D as measured by ECLIA (Roche) was assessed in the population-based study using general linear models with multivariate adjustments. In the validation study, serum levels of 25(OH)D were analysed with liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry assay from two different laboratories, RIA (DiaSorin), HPLC, RIA (IDS) and ECLIA (Roche). T-tests and linear mixed model analyses were performed to compare the serum 25(OH)D levels in smokers and non-smokers within and between the methods.

RESULTS

In the population-based study, the serum levels of 25(OH)D using the ECLIA method were 51.9, 53.2 and 72.0 nmol/l in never, former and current smokers (P<0.01). In the validation study, the serum concentration of 25(OH)D was 10.3 nmol/l higher in smokers than in non-smokers (P<0.01) using the ECLIA (Roche), while non-significantly lower serum levels of 25(OH)D were found in smokers using the other five methods.

CONCLUSIONS

These two studies indicate that the ECLIA (Roche) overestimates serum 25(OH)D levels in smokers by unknown mechanisms. If confirmed, this might have clinical consequences, and the issue needs further exploration.

摘要

目的

由于我们发现使用罗氏电化学发光免疫分析(ECLIA)进行分析时,吸烟者的血清 25-羟维生素 D(25(OH)D)水平高于不吸烟者,因此本研究的目的是检验这种吸烟者和非吸烟者之间的差异是否在使用其他血清 25(OH)D 检测方法时仍然存在。

设计

1994-1995 年,对来自特罗姆瑟研究的 6932 名参与者进行了一项横断面基于人群的研究,并进行了一项比较 53 名非吸烟者和 54 名吸烟者的六种不同血清 25(OH)D 检测方法的验证研究。

方法

使用多变量调整的广义线性模型评估基于人群的研究中吸烟、季节和 ECLIA(罗氏)测定的血清 25(OH)D 之间的关系。在验证研究中,使用来自两个不同实验室的液相色谱-质谱联用分析(LC-MS)、放射免疫分析(DiaSorin)、高效液相色谱法(HPLC)、放射免疫分析(IDS)和 ECLIA(罗氏)分析血清 25(OH)D 水平。在方法内和方法之间进行 t 检验和线性混合模型分析,以比较吸烟者和非吸烟者的血清 25(OH)D 水平。

结果

在基于人群的研究中,使用 ECLIA 方法的血清 25(OH)D 水平分别为从不吸烟者、前吸烟者和现吸烟者的 51.9、53.2 和 72.0 nmol/L(P<0.01)。在验证研究中,使用 ECLIA(罗氏)时,吸烟者的血清 25(OH)D 浓度比非吸烟者高 10.3 nmol/L(P<0.01),而使用其他五种方法时,吸烟者的血清 25(OH)D 水平则无显著降低。

结论

这两项研究表明,ECLIA(罗氏)通过未知机制高估了吸烟者的血清 25(OH)D 水平。如果得到证实,这可能会产生临床后果,需要进一步探讨这个问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验