Suppr超能文献

评估新生儿血浆 25-羟维生素 D 浓度的方法学问题。

Methodological issues in assessing plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration in newborn infants.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition and Food Studies, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.

School of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Bone. 2014 Apr;61:186-90. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Jan 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although no gold standard exists, liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is a precise and accurate method for the analysis of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D). Immunoassays are more readily available and require small volume sampling, ideal for infant testing. The objective was to compare two commercially available immunoassays for measuring circulating 25(OH)D concentration in infant plasma against LC-MS/MS.

METHODS

Capillary blood samples from 103 infants were analyzed for plasma 25(OH)D using an enzyme immunoassay (EIA, Octeia, IDS Ltd.) and radioimmunoassay (RIA, DiaSorin). Plasma 25(OH)D(3), C-3 epimer of 25(OH)D(3) (3-epi-25(OH)D(3)) and 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (24,25(OH)(2)D(3)) were measured on the same samples using LC-MS/MS. To establish whether plasma 24,25(OH)(2)D(3) or 3-epi-25(OH)D(3) interferes with these immunoassay results, the zero 25(OH)D calibrator from each assay kit was spiked with increasing amounts of 24,25(OH)(2)D(3) or 3-epi-25(OH)D(3).

RESULTS

Classifying infants below the common vitamin D status targets of 50 nmol/L and 75 nmol/L respectively, 58% and 99% fell below using the RIA, 19% and 56% with the EIA and 31% and 76% with LC-MS/MS. Compared to LC-MS/MS, both immunoassays showed poor Bland-Altman limits of agreement for 25(OH)D concentrations (RIA: limits of agreement -27 to +13%; EIA: -12 to +41%), and mountain plots (folded cumulative distribution) depicted significant skew and bias. Spiked 24,25(OH)2D3 concentrations, but not 3-epi-25(OH)D3, appeared as >100% of known values on the EIA but not on the RIA thus, suggesting that the EIA may cross-react with 24,25(OH)(2)D(3) to a greater extent than 3-epi-25(OH)D(3).

CONCLUSION

Two common immunoassays resulted in very different classifications of vitamin D status possibly related to the interference of other vitamin D metabolites. Based on these data, LC-MS/MS assessment of vitamin D status is recommended in young infants (4-6 weeks of age).

摘要

背景

尽管没有金标准,但液相色谱串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)是分析血浆 25-羟维生素 D(25(OH)D)的精确而准确的方法。免疫测定法更容易获得,并且需要小体积采样,非常适合婴儿检测。目的是将两种市售的免疫测定法与 LC-MS/MS 相比,用于测量婴儿血浆中循环 25(OH)D 浓度。

方法

使用酶免疫测定法(EIA,Octeia,IDS Ltd.)和放射免疫测定法(RIA,DiaSorin)分析 103 名婴儿的毛细血管血样中的血浆 25(OH)D。使用 LC-MS/MS 在相同的样品上测量 25(OH)D(3),25(OH)D(3)的 C-3 差向异构体(3-epi-25(OH)D(3))和 24,25-二羟基维生素 D(24,25(OH)(2)D(3))。为了确定 24,25-(OH)(2)D(3)或 3-epi-25(OH)D(3)是否干扰这些免疫测定结果,从每个试剂盒的零 25(OH)D 校准品中添加了越来越多的 24,25-(OH)(2)D(3)或 3-epi-25(OH)D(3)。

结果

将婴儿分为低于 50 nmol/L 和 75 nmol/L 常见维生素 D 状态目标的婴儿,分别有 58%和 99%的婴儿使用 RIA 低于目标值,分别有 19%和 56%的婴儿使用 EIA 低于目标值,分别有 31%和 76%的婴儿使用 LC-MS/MS 低于目标值。与 LC-MS/MS 相比,两种免疫测定法在 25(OH)D 浓度的 Bland-Altman 协议限(RIA:协议限-27 至+13%;EIA:-12 至+41%)上显示出较差的一致性,并且山形图(折叠累积分布)显示出明显的偏斜和偏差。添加的 24,25-(OH)2D3 浓度,但不是 3-epi-25(OH)D3,在 EIA 上显示出大于 100%的已知值,但在 RIA 上则没有,这表明 EIA 可能比 3-epi-25(OH)D3 更强烈地与 24,25-(OH)(2)D(3)发生交叉反应。

结论

两种常见的免疫测定法导致维生素 D 状态的分类非常不同,这可能与其他维生素 D 代谢物的干扰有关。基于这些数据,建议在 4-6 周龄的婴儿中使用 LC-MS/MS 评估维生素 D 状态。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验