RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2010 May 18;152(10):649-54. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-10-201005180-00005.
Some health plans profile physicians on the basis of their relative costs and use these profiles to assign physicians to cost categories. Physician organizations have questioned whether the rules used to attribute costs to a physician affect the cost category to which that physician is assigned.
To evaluate the effect of 12 different attribution rules on physician cost profiles.
Under each of the 12 attribution rules, a cost profile was created for the physicians in the aggregated claims database and the physicians were assigned to a cost category (high cost, average cost, low cost, or low sample size). The attribution rules differed by unit of analysis, signal for responsibility, number of physicians who can be assigned responsibility, and threshold value for assigning responsibility.
Four commercial health plans in Massachusetts.
1.1 million adults continuously enrolled in 4 commercial health plans in 2004 and 2005.
Percentage of all episodes assigned to any physician and percentage of costs billed by a physician that were included in his or her own profile were calculated under each rule. The cost category assignments from a commonly used default rule were compared with those from each of the other 11 attribution rules and the rate of disagreement was calculated.
Percentage of episodes that could be assigned to a physician varied substantially across the 12 rules (range, 20% to 69%), as did the mean percentage of costs billed by a physician that were included in that physician's own cost profile (range, 13% to 60%). Depending on the alternate rule used, between 17% and 61% of physicians would be assigned to a different cost category than that assigned by using the default rule.
Results might differ if data from another state or from Medicare were used.
The choice of attribution rule affects how costs are assigned to a physician and can substantially affect the cost category to which a physician is assigned.
U.S. Department of Labor.
一些健康计划根据医生的相对成本对其进行分析,并使用这些分析结果将医生分配到不同的成本类别中。医生组织对用于将成本归因于医生的规则是否会影响医生所属的成本类别提出了质疑。
评估 12 种不同归因规则对医生成本分析的影响。
在每种归因规则下,都会为汇总索赔数据库中的医生创建成本分析,并将医生分配到成本类别(高成本、平均成本、低成本或样本量低)中。归因规则因分析单位、责任信号、可归因于责任的医生人数和分配责任的阈值值而异。
马萨诸塞州的 4 家商业健康计划。
2004 年和 2005 年连续参加 4 家商业健康计划的 110 万成年人。
根据每种规则计算所有分配给任何医生的病例比例和医生计费的费用中包含在其自身分析中的比例。与常用默认规则相比,比较了其他 11 种归因规则中的每一种规则的成本类别分配,并计算了不一致的比例。
可分配给医生的病例比例在 12 种规则之间差异很大(范围为 20%至 69%),而医生计费的费用中包含在该医生自身成本分析中的比例也有很大差异(范围为 13%至 60%)。根据使用的替代规则,与使用默认规则相比,有 17%至 61%的医生将被分配到不同的成本类别中。
如果使用其他州或医疗保险的数据,结果可能会有所不同。
归因规则的选择会影响成本分配给医生的方式,并会对医生所属的成本类别产生重大影响。
美国劳工部。