Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查学习曲线:单中心对胃肠病学研究员的前瞻性评估。

Learning curves for colonoscopy: a prospective evaluation of gastroenterology fellows at a single center.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

Gut Liver. 2010 Mar;4(1):31-5. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2010.4.1.31. Epub 2010 Mar 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Colonoscopy training programs and the minimal experience with colonoscopy required to be considered technically competent are not well established. The aim of this study was to determine the colonoscopy learning curves and factors associated with this difficult procedure at a single center.

METHODS

A total of 3,243 colonoscopies were performed by 12 first-year gastroenterology fellows, and various clinical factors were assessed prospectively for 22 months. Acquisition of competence (success rate) was evaluated based on two objective criteria: (i) the adjusted completion rate (>90%) and (ii) cecal intubation time (<20 minutes).

RESULTS

The overall success rate in reaching the cecum in less than 20 minutes was 72.8%. The cecal intubation time was 9.34+/-4.13 minutes (mean+/-SD). Trainees' skill at performing cecal intubation in <20 minutes reached the requisite standard of competence after 200 procedures. Cecal intubation time decreased significantly from 11.3 to 9.4 minutes after 100 procedures and improved continuously thereafter. Female patients and advanced patient age (over 60 years) were associated with prolonged cecal intubation time (>20 minutes). Surgery of the uterus and ovaries was significantly correlated with delayed cecal intubation time, but not after sufficient colonoscopy experience.

CONCLUSIONS

The minimum number of procedures to reach technical competence was 200. The cecal intubation time was longer in female and older patients.

摘要

背景/目的:结肠镜检查培训计划和被认为具有技术能力所需的最低结肠镜检查经验尚未得到很好的确定。本研究的目的是确定在单个中心进行结肠镜检查的学习曲线和与该困难程序相关的因素。

方法

共有 3243 例结肠镜检查由 12 名第一年的胃肠病学研究员进行,前瞻性评估了 22 个月的各种临床因素。根据两个客观标准评估获得能力(成功率):(i)调整后的完成率(>90%)和(ii)盲肠插管时间(<20 分钟)。

结果

在不到 20 分钟内到达盲肠的总体成功率为 72.8%。盲肠插管时间为 9.34+/-4.13 分钟(平均值+/-标准差)。培训师在 200 次操作后达到了在<20 分钟内进行盲肠插管的必要标准,其盲肠插管技能达到了所需的能力标准。在 100 次操作后,盲肠插管时间从 11.3 分钟显著减少到 9.4 分钟,此后持续改善。女性患者和老年患者(超过 60 岁)与盲肠插管时间延长(>20 分钟)相关。子宫和卵巢手术与盲肠插管时间延迟显著相关,但在有足够的结肠镜检查经验后则没有关系。

结论

达到技术能力的最低操作次数为 200 次。女性和老年患者的盲肠插管时间较长。

相似文献

1
Learning curves for colonoscopy: a prospective evaluation of gastroenterology fellows at a single center.
Gut Liver. 2010 Mar;4(1):31-5. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2010.4.1.31. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
3
Assessment of competency in endoscopy: establishing and validating generalizable competency benchmarks for colonoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Mar;83(3):516-23.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.041. Epub 2015 Jun 13.
4
Predictive factors affecting cecal intubation failure in colonoscopy trainees.
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Jan 19;13:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-5.
5
Impact of cap-assisted colonoscopy on the learning curve and quality in colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):723-732.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
6
Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Aug;74(2):355-366.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.02.019. Epub 2011 Apr 23.
7
Colonoscopy learning curves for colorectal surgery fellow trainees: experiences with the 15-year colonoscopy training program.
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018 Oct;95(4):169-174. doi: 10.4174/astr.2018.95.4.169. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
8
Fellowship Colonoscopy Training and Preparedness for Independent Gastroenterology Practice.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;50(1):45-51. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000376.
9
Competency in esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a validated tool for assessment and generalizable benchmarks for gastroenterology fellows.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Oct;90(4):613-620.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.05.024. Epub 2019 May 20.
10
Early Splenic Flexure Intubation Competency Predicts Early Cecal Intubation Competency in Gastroenterology Fellows.
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Nov;61(11):3155-3160. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4265-4. Epub 2016 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

3
Sex Difference of Colon Adenoma Pathway and Colorectal Carcinogenesis.
World J Mens Health. 2024 Apr;42(2):256-282. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.230085. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
4
The imitation game: a review of the use of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy, and endoscopists' perceptions thereof.
Ann Coloproctol. 2023 Oct;39(5):385-394. doi: 10.3393/ac.2022.00878.0125. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
5
Automatic anatomical classification of colonoscopic images using deep convolutional neural networks.
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2020 Dec 7;9(3):226-233. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goaa078. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Hydro-jet propelled colonoscopy: proof of concept in a phantom colon.
Surg Endosc. 2021 Feb;35(2):989-995. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08089-z. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
7
Sex difference in bowel preparation quality and colonoscopy time.
Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(2):322-331. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2019.040. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
8
Using computerized assessment in simulated colonoscopy: a validation study.
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Jun;8(6):E783-E791. doi: 10.1055/a-1132-5259. Epub 2020 May 25.
9
Development of a fundamentals of endoscopic surgery proficiency-based skills curriculum for general surgery residents.
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):771-778. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06827-6. Epub 2019 May 17.
10
Colonoscopy learning curves for colorectal surgery fellow trainees: experiences with the 15-year colonoscopy training program.
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018 Oct;95(4):169-174. doi: 10.4174/astr.2018.95.4.169. Epub 2018 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortium.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):645-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.034.
2
The quality of screening colonoscopies in an office-based endoscopy clinic.
Can J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jan;23(1):41-7. doi: 10.1155/2009/831029.
3
Factors affecting cecal and ileal intubation time in colonoscopy.
Med Klin (Munich). 2008 Jul 15;103(7):477-81. doi: 10.1007/s00063-008-1071-6.
5
Factors affecting the technical difficulty of colonoscopy.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Jul-Aug;54(77):1403-6.
6
Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study.
Gastroenterology. 2007 Jun;132(7):2297-303. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.032. Epub 2007 Mar 21.
7
Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Nov;54(5):558-62. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.118950.
10
Objective evaluation of endoscopy skills during training.
Ann Intern Med. 1993 Jan 1;118(1):40-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-1-199301010-00008.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验