• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法国住院医师结肠镜检查能力的学习曲线及强化训练与渐进式训练影响的前瞻性评估。

Prospective assessment of learning curve and impact of intensive versus progressive training in colonoscopy competence among French residents.

作者信息

Wintzer-Wehekind Léonard, Moulis Lionel, Camus Marine, Vanbiervliet Geoffroy, Benamouzig Robert, Duflos Claire, Caillo Ludovic, Assenat Eric, Barthet Marc, Gonzalez Jean-Michel, Debourdeau Antoine

机构信息

Gastroenterology Unit, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier Univ, MUSE, Montpellier, France.

Biostatistics Unit, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier Univ, MUSE, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2025 Mar 11;25(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06924-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-06924-2
PMID:40069701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11899161/
Abstract

BACKGROUNDS

There are no existing data in the literature on the learning curve of French interns in colonoscopy or on the comparison between different frequencies of colonoscopy training modalities. We aimed to assess the number of procedures required for French residents in hepatogastroenterology to achieve competency in colonoscopy.

METHODS

The primary outcome was achieving greater than 90% cecal intubation rate (CIR90) competency using the Learning Curve-Cumulative Summation (LC-CUSUM) method. Participants with over 80 procedures were categorized into intensive and progressive training groups. We compared the proportion of residents reaching competency, the number of colonoscopies to reach it, and the speed of competency.

RESULTS

The study included 81 residents, totaling 6,259 procedures. 29 did more than 80 procedures: 12 in the progressive group and 17 in the intensive group. 204 colonoscopies were needed for reaching CIR90 competency (21% of residents). Achievement rates were similar across groups: 50% in the progressive and 65% in the intensive group (p = 0.50). LC competency was reached by 8.6% of residents after an average of 225 procedures, with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.21). Survival analysis showed no significant difference in the speed of competency acquisition between groups (p = 0.77 and p = 0.14, respectively). The Polyp Detection Rate (PDR) averaged 40%.

CONCLUSION

Given that only 21% reached CIR90, efforts are needed to increase the number of colonoscopies during training.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

摘要

背景

文献中尚无关于法国实习医生结肠镜检查学习曲线或不同结肠镜检查培训模式频率比较的现有数据。我们旨在评估法国胃肠肝病学住院医师达到结肠镜检查能力所需的操作数量。

方法

主要结局是使用学习曲线累积和(LC-CUSUM)方法达到盲肠插管率(CIR90)大于90%的能力。操作超过80次的参与者被分为强化训练组和渐进训练组。我们比较了达到能力的住院医师比例、达到该能力所需的结肠镜检查次数以及能力提升速度。

结果

该研究纳入了81名住院医师,总共进行了6259次操作。29人操作次数超过80次:渐进组12人,强化组17人。达到CIR90能力需要204次结肠镜检查(占住院医师的21%)。各组的成功率相似:渐进组为50%,强化组为65%(p = 0.50)。平均225次操作后,8.6%的住院医师达到LC能力,两组之间无显著差异(p = 0.21)。生存分析显示两组之间在能力获得速度上无显著差异(分别为p = 0.77和p = 0.14)。息肉检出率(PDR)平均为40%。

结论

鉴于只有21%的人达到CIR90,需要努力增加培训期间结肠镜检查的次数。

临床试验编号

不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5768/11899161/7d7e9be86778/12909_2025_6924_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5768/11899161/26421387e10d/12909_2025_6924_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5768/11899161/46a6e20dca5c/12909_2025_6924_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5768/11899161/f05f3b4689a8/12909_2025_6924_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5768/11899161/28161bf808b7/12909_2025_6924_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5768/11899161/7e7998a14c93/12909_2025_6924_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5768/11899161/c6c91b6b90ad/12909_2025_6924_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5768/11899161/5cd3c687db97/12909_2025_6924_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5768/11899161/7d7e9be86778/12909_2025_6924_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5768/11899161/26421387e10d/12909_2025_6924_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5768/11899161/46a6e20dca5c/12909_2025_6924_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5768/11899161/f05f3b4689a8/12909_2025_6924_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5768/11899161/28161bf808b7/12909_2025_6924_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5768/11899161/7e7998a14c93/12909_2025_6924_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5768/11899161/c6c91b6b90ad/12909_2025_6924_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5768/11899161/5cd3c687db97/12909_2025_6924_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5768/11899161/7d7e9be86778/12909_2025_6924_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prospective assessment of learning curve and impact of intensive versus progressive training in colonoscopy competence among French residents.法国住院医师结肠镜检查能力的学习曲线及强化训练与渐进式训练影响的前瞻性评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Mar 11;25(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06924-2.
2
Impact of cap-assisted colonoscopy on the learning curve and quality in colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.帽辅助结肠镜检查对结肠镜检查学习曲线和质量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):723-732.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
3
Early Splenic Flexure Intubation Competency Predicts Early Cecal Intubation Competency in Gastroenterology Fellows.早期脾曲插管能力可预测胃肠病学住院医师的早期盲肠插管能力。
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Nov;61(11):3155-3160. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4265-4. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
4
Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards.结肠镜检查能力培训:评估和定义能力标准。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Aug;74(2):355-366.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.02.019. Epub 2011 Apr 23.
5
An adequate level of training for technical competence in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter evaluation of the learning curve.筛查和诊断性结肠镜检查技术能力的充分培训水平:学习曲线的前瞻性多中心评估
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Apr;67(4):683-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.018. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
6
Assessment of competency in endoscopy: establishing and validating generalizable competency benchmarks for colonoscopy.内镜检查能力评估:建立并验证结肠镜检查可推广的能力基准。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Mar;83(3):516-23.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.041. Epub 2015 Jun 13.
7
An analysis of the learning curve to achieve competency at colonoscopy using the JETS database.使用JETS数据库对结肠镜检查技能熟练掌握的学习曲线进行分析。
Gut. 2014 Nov;63(11):1746-54. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305973. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
8
Surgical resident's training in colonoscopy: numbers, competency, and perceptions.结直肠镜检查中外科住院医师的培训:数量、能力和认知。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Oct;24(10):2556-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1002-5. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
9
Do breaks in gastroenterology fellow endoscopy training result in a decrement in competency in colonoscopy?在胃肠病学研究员内镜培训中休息是否会导致结肠镜检查能力下降?
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Sep;78(3):503-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.03.1331. Epub 2013 May 6.
10
Assessment of screening colonoscopy competency in colon and rectal surgery fellows: a single institution experience.评估结直肠外科住院医师的结肠镜筛查能力:单机构经验。
J Surg Res. 2012 May 1;174(1):e17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.048. Epub 2011 Oct 14.

本文引用的文献

1
JAG consensus statements for training and certification in colonoscopy.结肠镜检查培训与认证的JAG共识声明。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 27;14(3):201-221. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102260. eCollection 2023.
2
Defining the learning curves of colorectal surgical trainees in colonoscopy using the Assessment of Competency in Endoscopy tool.使用内镜能力评估工具定义结直肠外科受训者在结肠镜检查中的学习曲线。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Aug;96(2):301-307.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.019. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
3
Colonoscopy Direct Observation of Procedural Skills Assessment Tool for Evaluating Competency Development During Training.
结肠镜直接观察操作技能评估工具,用于评估培训期间的能力发展。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Feb;115(2):234-243. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000426.
4
Endoscopic training: A nationwide survey of French fellows in gastroenterology.内镜培训:一项针对法国胃肠病学住院医师的全国性调查。
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr;42(2):160-167. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
5
Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative.下消化道内镜检查的性能指标:欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)质量改进倡议
Endoscopy. 2017 Apr;49(4):378-397. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-103411. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
6
Assessment of competency in endoscopy: establishing and validating generalizable competency benchmarks for colonoscopy.内镜检查能力评估:建立并验证结肠镜检查可推广的能力基准。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Mar;83(3):516-23.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.041. Epub 2015 Jun 13.
7
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Competency Assessment Tool: reliability and validity evidence.胃肠道内镜能力评估工具:可靠性和有效性证据。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(6):1417-1424.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.030. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
8
An analysis of the learning curve to achieve competency at colonoscopy using the JETS database.使用JETS数据库对结肠镜检查技能熟练掌握的学习曲线进行分析。
Gut. 2014 Nov;63(11):1746-54. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305973. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
9
Do breaks in gastroenterology fellow endoscopy training result in a decrement in competency in colonoscopy?在胃肠病学研究员内镜培训中休息是否会导致结肠镜检查能力下降?
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Sep;78(3):503-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.03.1331. Epub 2013 May 6.
10
A method for monitoring a process from an out of control to an in control state: Application to the learning curve.一种从失控状态到控制状态的过程监测方法:在学习曲线上的应用。
Stat Med. 2010 Aug 15;29(18):1900-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.3947.