• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肠道准备质量和结肠镜检查时间的性别差异。

Sex difference in bowel preparation quality and colonoscopy time.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Liver Research, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(2):322-331. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2019.040. Epub 2020 Jun 22.

DOI:10.3904/kjim.2019.040
PMID:32564572
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7969071/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The length of colon is known to be longer in females than in males. In addition, the morphology of colon cancer is different between males and females. The aim of this study was to investigate sex differences in Boston bowel preparation score (BBPS) and colonoscopy insertion time.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed medical records and colonoscopy readings of subjects who underwent colonoscopy at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from March 2015 to April 2018. BPPS was used to evaluate the degree of colon cleanness before colonoscopy. Statistical analysis was performed to compare demographic, clinical, and outcome variables between two groups.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of a total of 12,561 patients (6,148 females and 6,413 males). Mean age was 57.8 ± 13.5 years for females and 57.5 ± 13.8 years for males (p = 0.695). Females showed better bowel preparation than males (mean total score: 7.4 ± 1.8 vs. 7.2 ± 1.9, p = 0.001; total score ≥ 6: 5,340 [86.9%] vs. 5,437 [84.8%], p = 0.001; BBPS ≥ 2 for all segments: 5,048 [82.1%] vs. 5,097 [79.5%], p < 0.001). However, cecal intubation time (8.3 ± 6.2 minutes vs. 6.2 ± 6.1 minutes, p < 0.001) and withdrawal time (7.9 ± 3.5 minutes vs. 7.4 ± 3.1 minutes, p < 0.001) were longer in males.

CONCLUSION

There were sex differences in BBPS, cecal intubation time, and withdrawal time for subjects undergoing colonoscopy.

摘要

背景/目的:已知女性的结肠长度长于男性。此外,男性和女性的结肠癌形态也不同。本研究旨在探讨波士顿肠道准备评分(BBPS)和结肠镜插入时间的性别差异。

方法

本研究回顾性分析了 2015 年 3 月至 2018 年 4 月在首尔国立大学盆唐医院接受结肠镜检查的患者的病历和结肠镜检查结果。BBPS 用于评估结肠镜检查前结肠的清洁程度。对两组的人口统计学、临床和结果变量进行了统计学分析。

结果

研究组共纳入 12561 例患者(女性 6148 例,男性 6413 例)。女性的平均年龄为 57.8 ± 13.5 岁,男性为 57.5 ± 13.8 岁(p = 0.695)。女性的肠道准备情况优于男性(总评分均值:7.4 ± 1.8 比 7.2 ± 1.9,p = 0.001;总评分≥6 分:5340[86.9%]比 5437[84.8%],p = 0.001;所有节段的 BBPS≥2 分:5048[82.1%]比 5097[79.5%],p<0.001)。然而,男性的盲肠插管时间(8.3 ± 6.2 分钟比 6.2 ± 6.1 分钟,p<0.001)和退镜时间(7.9 ± 3.5 分钟比 7.4 ± 3.1 分钟,p<0.001)较长。

结论

接受结肠镜检查的患者在 BBPS、盲肠插管时间和退镜时间方面存在性别差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eda2/7969071/0e7baf6e3e40/kjim-2019-040f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eda2/7969071/515fe83ba6a8/kjim-2019-040f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eda2/7969071/0e7baf6e3e40/kjim-2019-040f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eda2/7969071/515fe83ba6a8/kjim-2019-040f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eda2/7969071/0e7baf6e3e40/kjim-2019-040f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex difference in bowel preparation quality and colonoscopy time.肠道准备质量和结肠镜检查时间的性别差异。
Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(2):322-331. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2019.040. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
2
Cecal intubation time in screening colonoscopy.筛查结肠镜检查中的盲肠插管时间。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 14;100(19):e25927. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025927.
3
Effect of physician-provided education on the quality of bowel preparation.医生提供的教育对肠道准备质量的影响。
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2021 Jul-Sep;84(3):407-410. doi: 10.51821/84.3.009.
4
Quantification of Adequate Bowel Preparation for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy in Men.男性筛查或监测结肠镜检查中充分肠道准备的量化评估
Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb;150(2):396-405; quiz e14-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.041. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
5
Providing Hospitalized Patients With an Educational Booklet Increases the Quality of Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation.为住院患者提供教育手册可提高结肠镜肠道准备质量。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jun;14(6):858-864. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.11.015. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
6
Importance of reporting segmental bowel preparation scores during colonoscopy in clinical practice.结肠镜检查过程中报告节段性肠道准备评分在临床实践中的重要性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr 7;21(13):3994-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i13.3994.
7
Impact of bowel preparation on caecal intubation time during colonoscopy.肠道准备对结肠镜检查时盲肠插管时间的影响。
Pak J Med Sci. 2019 Nov-Dec;35(6):1516-1519. doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.6.1031.
8
Comparison of cecal intubation and adenoma detection between hospitals can provide incentives to improve quality of colonoscopy.医院之间盲肠插管和腺瘤检测情况的比较可为提高结肠镜检查质量提供动力。
Endoscopy. 2015 Aug;47(8):703-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391968. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
9
Factors effecting cecal intubation time during colonoscopy.结肠镜检查时盲肠插管时间的影响因素。
Ann Ital Chir. 2021;92:665-670.
10
Impact of Colonoscopy Preparation Video on Boston Bowel Preparation Scale Score.结肠镜检查准备视频对波士顿肠道准备量表评分的影响。
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2019 May/Jun;42(3):251-258. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000391.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring intraprocedural performance in colonoscopy: Insights from a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.探索结肠镜检查术中的操作表现:来自沙特阿拉伯一家三级医疗中心的见解。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2025 May 1;31(3):185-192. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_17_25. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
2
THE USE OF ABDOMINAL CORSETS ON COLONOSCOPY: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL.腹部束腹带在结肠镜检查中的应用:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2025 Mar 14;38:e1873. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720202500004e1873. eCollection 2025.
3
Quality of endoscopic surveillance of Lynch syndrome patients in a Swedish cohort.

本文引用的文献

1
Bowel preparation quality scales for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查用肠道准备质量评分量表。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul 14;24(26):2833-2843. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i26.2833.
2
Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2015.韩国癌症统计数据:2015 年发病率、死亡率、生存率和流行率。
Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Apr;50(2):303-316. doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.143. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
3
Comparison of Tight Junction Protein-Related Gene mRNA Expression Levels between Male and Female Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Patients.
瑞典队列中林奇综合征患者的内镜监测质量
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Jul 4;12(7):E854-E860. doi: 10.1055/a-2339-7152. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Shortening Oral Simethicone-to-Colonoscopy Interval Increases Bowel Preparation Quality.缩短口服西甲硅油与结肠镜检查的间隔时间可提高肠道准备质量。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Jun 22;30:e943972. doi: 10.12659/MSM.943972.
5
Strategies to improve screening colonoscopy quality for the prevention of colorectal cancer.提高结直肠癌预防筛查结肠镜检查质量的策略。
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Jul;39(4):547-554. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.334. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
6
Sex Difference of Colon Adenoma Pathway and Colorectal Carcinogenesis.结肠腺瘤通路与结直肠癌发生的性别差异。
World J Mens Health. 2024 Apr;42(2):256-282. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.230085. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
7
Graphical education and appropriate time before elective colonoscopy make better bowel preparation.在择期结肠镜检查前进行图形化教育并给予适当时间,可使肠道准备更佳。
J Minim Access Surg. 2023 Jan-Mar;19(1):130-137. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_338_21.
8
The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation.确定理想肠道准备方法的未满足需求。
JGH Open. 2021 Sep 17;5(10):1135-1141. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12653. eCollection 2021 Oct.
比较男女胃食管反流病患者紧密连接蛋白相关基因 mRNA 表达水平。
Gut Liver. 2018 Jul 15;12(4):411-419. doi: 10.5009/gnl17419.
4
Patient Characteristics Associated With Quality of Colonoscopy Preparation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.与结肠镜检查准备质量相关的患者特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Mar;16(3):357-369.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
5
Gender Differences in Factors Associated With Colorectal Cancer Screening: A National Cross-Sectional Study in Korea.结直肠癌筛查相关因素的性别差异:韩国一项全国性横断面研究
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2017 Sep;29(6):495-505. doi: 10.1177/1010539517718336. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
6
Gender disparity in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): multiple underlying mechanisms.肝细胞癌(HCC)中的性别差异:多种潜在机制。
Sci China Life Sci. 2017 Jun;60(6):575-584. doi: 10.1007/s11427-016-9043-9. Epub 2017 May 23.
7
Complete colonoscopy: impact of patients' demographics and anthropometry on caecal intubation time.全结肠镜检查:患者人口统计学特征和人体测量学对盲肠插管时间的影响
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 7;3(1):e000076. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2016-000076. eCollection 2016.
8
Validated Scales for Colon Cleansing: A Systematic Review.结肠清洁的验证量表:系统评价
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb;111(2):197-204; quiz 205. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.417. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
9
Quantification of Adequate Bowel Preparation for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy in Men.男性筛查或监测结肠镜检查中充分肠道准备的量化评估
Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb;150(2):396-405; quiz e14-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.041. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
10
Gender differences in colorectal cancer survival in Japan.日本结直肠癌生存率的性别差异。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb;21(1):194-203. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0868-6. Epub 2015 Jul 7.