The Cognitive Developmental Research Unit (EKUP), Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway.
Psychol Med. 2011 Mar;41(3):601-10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710001030. Epub 2010 May 19.
The aim of this study was to investigate three main aspects of executive functions (EFs), i.e. shifting, updating and inhibition, in adolescents engaging in non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) as compared with healthy controls.
EFs were assessed using the Intra/Extradimensional Set Shift, the Spatial Working Memory (SWM) Test and the Stop Signal Test (SST) from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB), in a high-severity NSSI group (n=33), a low-severity NSSI group (n=29) and a healthy control group (n=35). Diagnostic characteristics were examined using the Kiddie-Sads-Present and Lifetime Version.
There were group differences on the SWM Test. A trend towards an interaction effect of sex revealed that males in the high-severity NSSI group made significantly more errors than males and females in the control group. Both males and females in the high-severity NSSI group made poor use of an efficient strategy in completing the test. The low-severity NSSI group performed poorly on the SST, making more errors than the control group and showing an impaired ability to inhibit initiated responses, as compared with the high-severity NSSI group. There were group differences in frequencies of current and previous major depressive disorder. However, no effects of these diagnoses were found on any of the EF tests.
This study demonstrates that NSSI subgroups have distinct deficits in EFs. The high-severity NSSI group has working memory deficits, while the low-severity NSSI group has impaired inhibitory control. This supports the emotion regulation hypothesis.
本研究旨在调查非自杀性自我伤害(NSSI)青少年与健康对照组在执行功能(EF)的三个主要方面,即转换、更新和抑制方面的差异。
使用剑桥神经心理学测试自动化电池(CANTAB)的内/外维度转换、空间工作记忆(SWM)测试和停止信号测试(SST)评估 EF,包括高严重程度 NSSI 组(n=33)、低严重程度 NSSI 组(n=29)和健康对照组(n=35)。使用 Kiddie-Sads-Present 和 Lifetime 版本检查诊断特征。
SWM 测试存在组间差异。性别存在交互作用的趋势,表明高严重程度 NSSI 组中的男性比对照组中的男性和女性犯的错误更多。高严重程度 NSSI 组中的男性和女性在完成测试时都无法有效地利用策略。低严重程度 NSSI 组在 SST 上表现不佳,比对照组犯的错误更多,并且与高严重程度 NSSI 组相比,他们抑制启动反应的能力受损。当前和以前重度抑郁症的发生率存在组间差异。然而,这些诊断对任何 EF 测试都没有影响。
这项研究表明,NSSI 亚组在执行功能方面存在明显的缺陷。高严重程度 NSSI 组存在工作记忆缺陷,而低严重程度 NSSI 组存在抑制控制受损。这支持了情绪调节假说。