Energy and Resources Research Institute, School of Process, Environmental and Materials Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Bioresour Technol. 2010 Oct;101(19):7614-23. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.055. Epub 2010 May 18.
The efficient management of waste biomass is an important environmental problem in agricultural countries. Often land-fill is the main disposal route with ramifications including CH(4) release having 21 times greater global warming potential per molecule than CO(2). Biomasses are considered to be CO(2)-neutral fuels when combusted. Moreover, they are renewable and covered by the renewable obligation scheme and eligible for certificates in the UK. The overall objective of the investigation is to assess the performance of selected biomass and coal co-firing under two different modes of operation, air-staging and fuel-staging with the benefit of reduced-NO(x) and SO(2) emissions in power plant. The biomasses chosen for the study, shea meal (SM) and cotton stalk (CS) have very different cellulose/lignin compositions and different reported thermal behaviour. A series of experiments have been carried out in a 20 kW, down fired combustor using coal, shea meal-coal and cotton stalk-coal blends under un-staged, air-staged and fuel-staged co-combustion configurations. For air-staging, an optimum value of primary zone stoichiometry SR(1)=0.9 was found. Keeping it fixed, the shea meal and cotton stalk content in the coal-biomass blends was set to 5%, 10% and 15% on thermal basis. NO reductions of 51% and 60% were achieved using SM and CS, respectively, with an optimum thermal biomass blending ratio (BBR) of 10%. The results obtained were compared with un-staged and air-staged results for coal without the addition of biomass. Similarly for fuel-staging, keeping the length of the reburn and burnout zone fixed, SM and CS were evaluated as reductive fuel using different reburn fuel fractions (R(ff)) of 5%, 10%, 15% and 20%. NO reductions of 83% and 84% were obtained with an optimum R(ff) of 15% with an optimum reburn zone stoichiometry of SR(2)=0.8 for both SM and CS, respectively. SO(2) reduction and char burnout efficiency were also evaluated. It was found that addition of biomass coupled with air and fuel-staging techniques reduced-NO(x) and SO(2) simultaneously while at the same time improving the char burnout efficiency.
高效管理废生物质是农业国家面临的一个重要环境问题。通常,垃圾填埋是主要的处理途径,其后果包括每分子甲烷的全球变暖潜能是二氧化碳的 21 倍。生物质在燃烧时被认为是二氧化碳中性燃料。此外,它们是可再生的,并受可再生能源义务计划的约束,有资格在英国获得证书。该研究的总体目标是评估在两种不同操作模式下,即空气分级和燃料分级下,选择的生物质和煤的混烧性能,以减少电厂的氮氧化物和二氧化硫排放。选择用于研究的生物质是乳木果油渣(SM)和棉秆(CS),它们的纤维素/木质素组成非常不同,热行为也有不同的报道。在一个 20kW 的下燃式燃烧器中进行了一系列实验,使用煤、乳木果油渣-煤和棉秆-煤混合物,在未分级、空气分级和燃料分级的共燃配置下进行实验。对于空气分级,发现一级区化学计量比 SR(1)=0.9 是最佳值。保持其固定,在煤-生物质混合物中,乳木果油渣和棉秆的含量分别设定为 5%、10%和 15%(基于热基础)。使用 SM 和 CS 分别实现了 51%和 60%的 NO 减排,最佳的热生物质混合比(BBR)为 10%。将得到的结果与未分级和空气分级的不加生物质的煤的结果进行了比较。同样,对于燃料分级,在保持再燃区和燃尽区长度不变的情况下,将乳木果油渣和棉秆分别作为还原燃料,使用不同的再燃燃料分数(R(ff))5%、10%、15%和 20%进行评估。使用 SM 和 CS 时,分别得到 83%和 84%的 NO 减排,最佳的 R(ff)为 15%,最佳的再燃区化学计量比为 SR(2)=0.8。同时还评估了 SO(2)减排和炭燃烧效率。结果表明,添加生物质并结合空气和燃料分级技术,同时减少氮氧化物和二氧化硫排放,同时提高炭燃烧效率。