• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重复遭受人际暴力的受害者与非重复遭受人际暴力的受害者和一般人群在人口统计学和社会经济学特征方面是否存在不同?一项基于人群的病例对照研究。

Do repeat victims of interpersonal violence have different demographic and socioeconomic characters from non-repeat victims of interpersonal violence and the general population? A population-based case-control study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Public Health. 2010 Jul;38(5):524-32. doi: 10.1177/1403494810370234. Epub 2010 May 19.

DOI:10.1177/1403494810370234
PMID:20484309
Abstract

AIM

To study if adult repeat victims of violence have different demographic and socioeconomic character from non-repeat victims of violence and the general population.

METHODS

Case-control study comparing demographic and socioeconomic characteristics before first-time victimisation among repeat victims of violence to that of non-repeat victims and population-based controls. Repeat and non-repeat victims were included from an urban emergency department and an institute for forensic medicine. Data was analysed using logistic regression in unadjusted, semi-adjusted, and fully-adjusted models.

RESULTS

For almost all demographic and socioeconomic factors in our study, the strongest associations were found when repeat victims were compared to population-based controls, whereas associations obtained from comparison with non-repeat victims were less pronounced. Compared to non-repeat victims, factors most strongly associated with repeat victimisation were being a pensioner (OR 3.21), being unemployed (OR 2.11), high level of lifetime unemployment (OR 1.50), high level of household crowding (OR 1.49), and living without a partner (OR 1.30). Compared to population-based controls, factors most strongly associated with victimisation were being a pensioner (OR 6.83), being unemployed (OR 3.01), living without a partner (OR 3.15), high level of lifetime unemployment (OR 2.40), high levels of household crowding (OR 2.35), large age difference to partner (OR 1.82), and citizenship in a country outside Europe (OR 1.61).

CONCLUSIONS

The study indicates that repeat victims of violence may be a demographic and socioeconomic subgroup of adult victims of violence characterised by certain pronounced risk factors which are already present at the time of the first episode of violent victimisation.

摘要

目的

研究成年暴力重复受害者与非重复暴力受害者和一般人群在人口统计学和社会经济学特征方面是否存在差异。

方法

采用病例对照研究,比较暴力重复受害者与非重复受害者和基于人群的对照组首次受害前的人口统计学和社会经济学特征。重复和非重复受害者均来自城市急诊室和法医研究所。使用逻辑回归在未调整、半调整和完全调整模型中对数据进行分析。

结果

在我们的研究中,几乎所有人口统计学和社会经济学因素中,重复受害者与基于人群的对照组相比,关联最强,而与非重复受害者相比,关联则不那么明显。与非重复受害者相比,与重复受害最强烈相关的因素是领取养老金(OR 3.21)、失业(OR 2.11)、终生失业水平高(OR 1.50)、家庭拥挤程度高(OR 1.49)和没有伴侣(OR 1.30)。与基于人群的对照组相比,与受害最强烈相关的因素是领取养老金(OR 6.83)、失业(OR 3.01)、没有伴侣(OR 3.15)、终生失业水平高(OR 2.40)、家庭拥挤程度高(OR 2.35)、与伴侣年龄差距大(OR 1.82)和公民身份在欧洲以外的国家(OR 1.61)。

结论

该研究表明,暴力重复受害者可能是成年暴力受害者中的一个人口统计学和社会经济学亚组,其特点是某些明显的风险因素在首次遭受暴力侵害时就已经存在。

相似文献

1
Do repeat victims of interpersonal violence have different demographic and socioeconomic characters from non-repeat victims of interpersonal violence and the general population? A population-based case-control study.重复遭受人际暴力的受害者与非重复遭受人际暴力的受害者和一般人群在人口统计学和社会经济学特征方面是否存在不同?一项基于人群的病例对照研究。
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Jul;38(5):524-32. doi: 10.1177/1403494810370234. Epub 2010 May 19.
2
Demographic and socioeconomic risk factors of adult violent victimization from an accident and emergency department and forensic medicine perspective: a register-based case-control study.从急诊科和法医学角度看成人暴力受害的人口统计学和社会经济风险因素:一项基于登记册的病例对照研究
J Forensic Leg Med. 2009 Jan;16(1):11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2008.05.014. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
3
What is the lifetime risk of contact with an A&E Department or an Institute of Forensic Medicine following violent victimisation?遭受暴力侵害后与急症室或法医学研究所接触的终生风险是多少?
Injury. 2008 Jan;39(1):121-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.05.004. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
4
Identifying victims of violence using register-based data.利用基于登记的资料识别暴力受害者。
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Aug;38(6):611-7. doi: 10.1177/1403494810377682. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
5
The epidemiology of repeat contacts with an Emergency Department or an Institute of Forensic Medicine due to violent victimization in a Danish urban population.丹麦城市人口中因暴力受害而再次接触急诊科或法医学研究所的流行病学情况。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2007 Aug;14(6):333-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcfm.2006.10.009. Epub 2007 Jan 18.
6
Violence in an urban community from the perspective of an accident and emergency department: a two-year prospective study.从急诊科角度看城市社区中的暴力行为:一项为期两年的前瞻性研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2004 Feb;10(2):CR75-9.
7
Urban residence, victimhood and the appraisal of personal safety in people with schizophrenia: results from the European Schizophrenia Cohort (EuroSC).城市居住环境、受害经历与精神分裂症患者对个人安全的评估:欧洲精神分裂症队列研究(EuroSC)结果
Psychol Med. 2008 Apr;38(4):591-7. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707001778. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
8
[Social vulnerability is more frequent in victims of interpersonal violence: value of the EPICES score].[人际暴力受害者中社会脆弱性更为常见:EPICES评分的价值]
Presse Med. 2009 Jun;38(6):881-92. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2008.10.016. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
9
Characteristics of victims of violence admitted to a specialized medico-legal unit in Switzerland.瑞士一家专门的法医学机构收治的暴力受害者特征。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2009 Jul;16(5):269-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2008.12.007. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
10
Criminal victimisation and health: examining the relation in nine countries of the former Soviet Union.犯罪受害与健康:在前苏联九个国家中考察这种关系。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Aug;91:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Violent victimization and revictimization in patients with depressive disorders: context characteristics, disclosure rates, and gender differences.抑郁障碍患者的暴力受害和再次受害:背景特征、披露率和性别差异。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 16;22(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04045-4.
2
Investigating exposure to violence and mental health in a diverse urban community sample: data from the South East London Community Health (SELCoH) survey.在一个多元化的城市社区样本中调查暴力暴露与心理健康:来自伦敦东南部社区健康(SELCoH)调查的数据。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 1;9(4):e93660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093660. eCollection 2014.
3
Is younger really safer? A qualitative study of perceived risks and benefits of age-disparate relationships among women in Cape Town, South Africa.
真的越年轻越好吗?对南非开普敦女性中年龄差异关系的感知风险和益处的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 15;8(11):e81748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081748. eCollection 2013.