• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科手术和经导管主动脉瓣手术。风险评分的局限性。

Surgical and transcatheter aortic valve procedures. The limits of risk scores.

作者信息

Ranucci Marco, Guarracino Fabio, Castelvecchio Serenella, Baldassarri Rubia, Covello Remo Daniel, Landoni Giovanni

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Policlinico S.Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Aug;11(2):138-41. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.236141. Epub 2010 May 19.

DOI:10.1510/icvts.2010.236141
PMID:20484408
Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement in very high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. The present multicenter, retrospective study investigates the accuracy and calibration properties of the EuroSCORE and the age, serum creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score in selecting a population of patients to be referred to TAVI. The study includes 1053 surgical and 211 transcatheter procedures. The operative mortality rate within the surgical group was 2%. The EuroSCORE and the ACEF score had similar levels of accuracy; the ACEF score was well calibrated and the EuroSCORE overestimated the mortality risk. The observed mortality rate within the transcatheter group was 10.4%. Cut-off values corresponding to a mortality rate of 10% were 26 for the logistic EuroSCORE and 2.5 for the ACEF score: both the EuroSCORE and the ACEF score may be used to refer patients to TAVI. However, they do not consider a number of 'extreme' risk conditions that may justify a transcatheter procedure even in absence of an overall elevated risk score. These risk conditions should be included in a specific risk model for referring patients for TAVI.

摘要

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)是患有严重主动脉瓣狭窄的极高风险患者进行外科主动脉瓣置换术的替代方案。本多中心回顾性研究调查了欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)以及年龄、血清肌酐和射血分数(ACEF)评分在选择适合接受TAVI治疗的患者群体时的准确性和校准特性。该研究纳入了1053例外科手术和211例经导管手术。外科手术组的手术死亡率为2%。EuroSCORE和ACEF评分的准确性水平相似;ACEF评分校准良好,而EuroSCORE高估了死亡风险。经导管手术组的观察到的死亡率为10.4%。逻辑EuroSCORE对应10%死亡率的临界值为26,ACEF评分的临界值为2.5:EuroSCORE和ACEF评分均可用于推荐患者接受TAVI。然而,它们没有考虑一些“极端”风险情况,即使在总体风险评分未升高的情况下,这些情况也可能成为经导管手术的理由。这些风险情况应纳入用于推荐患者接受TAVI的特定风险模型中。

相似文献

1
Surgical and transcatheter aortic valve procedures. The limits of risk scores.外科手术和经导管主动脉瓣手术。风险评分的局限性。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Aug;11(2):138-41. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.236141. Epub 2010 May 19.
2
Thirty-day outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgical valve replacement in patients with high-risk aortic stenosis: a matched comparison.高危主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科瓣膜置换术后30天的结局:一项匹配对照研究。
Coron Artery Dis. 2011 Dec;22(8):595-600. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32834d335e.
3
Simple bedside clinical evaluation versus established scores in the estimation of operative risk in valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis.单纯床边临床评估与既定评分系统在估测重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者行瓣膜置换术的手术风险中的对比。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Dec;106(12):651-60. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
4
Effect of severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction on hospital outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement: results from a propensity-matched population of the Italian OBSERVANT multicenter study.严重左心室收缩功能障碍对经导管主动脉瓣植入术或外科主动脉瓣置换术后住院结局的影响:来自意大利 OBSERVANT 多中心研究倾向匹配人群的结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
5
Early- and mid-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with logistic EuroSCORE less than 20%: a comparative analysis between different risk strata.经导管主动脉瓣植入术在 logistic EuroSCORE 小于 20%的患者中的早期和中期结果:不同风险分层之间的比较分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jan 1;79(1):132-40. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23100. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
6
Six-month results of a repositionable and retrievable pericardial valve for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the Direct Flow Medical aortic valve.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中可重定位和可回收的心包瓣的 6 个月结果:Direct Flow Medical 主动脉瓣。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Oct;140(4):897-903. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.01.017. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
7
Clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of "all-comers" undergoing transapical aortic valve implantation: results from the Italian Registry of Trans-Apical Aortic Valve Implantation (I-TA).“所有患者”行经心尖主动脉瓣置换术的临床和血液动力学结局:来自意大利经心尖主动脉瓣置换术注册研究(I-TA)的结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Oct;142(4):768-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.06.026. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
8
Quality-of-life in elderly patients one year after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis.老年患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄 1 年后的生活质量。
EuroIntervention. 2011 Sep;7(5):573-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I5A93.
9
Transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis assessing clinical effectiveness and safety.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:一项评估临床疗效和安全性的回顾性分析。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2012 Apr;13(4):229-41. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283515c0f.
10
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis-a new paradigm for multidisciplinary intervention: a prospective cohort study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄-多学科介入治疗的新模式:前瞻性队列研究。
Am Heart J. 2010 Aug;160(2):237-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.05.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation in Indonesia of two published scores for mortality prediction after cardiac surgery.印度尼西亚对两种已发表的心脏手术后死亡率预测评分进行验证。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2023 Jan-Mar;26(1):23-28. doi: 10.4103/aca.aca_297_20.
2
The importance of liver function assessment before cardiac surgery: A narrative review.心脏手术前肝功能评估的重要性:一项叙述性综述。
Front Surg. 2022 Dec 6;9:1053019. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1053019. eCollection 2022.
3
Experience of a high-risk aortic valve clinic in Ireland.爱尔兰一家高风险主动脉瓣诊所的经验。
Ir J Med Sci. 2014 Dec;183(4):653-7. doi: 10.1007/s11845-014-1071-x. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
4
Systematic review and meta-analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jan;2(1):10-23. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2012.11.09.
5
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and future approaches.经导管主动脉瓣植入术:当前和未来的方法。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 Nov 15;9(1):15-29. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.164.