Suppr超能文献

操场干预对儿童上午和午餐课间休息身体活动水平的 12 个月影响。

Twelve-month effects of a playground intervention on children's morning and lunchtime recess physical activity levels.

机构信息

Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2010 Mar;7(2):167-75. doi: 10.1123/jpah.7.2.167.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recess is an opportunity for children to engage in daily physical activity. The aim of this study was to investigate the 12-month effects of a playground intervention on children's moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA) and vigorous physical activity (VPA) during morning and lunchtime recess.

METHODS

Four hundred and seventy children (232 boys, 238 girls) from 26 elementary schools participated in the study. Fifteen schools redesigned the playground environment using playground markings and physical structures. Eleven schools served as socioeconomic matched controls. Physical activity levels were quantified using heart rate and accelerometry at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months post-intervention. A 3-level (time, pupil, and school) multilevel analysis was used to determine the effects of the intervention across time on MVPA and VPA.

RESULTS

Positive yet nonsignificant intervention effects were found for MVPA and VPA during morning and lunchtime recess. Intervention children were more active during recess than control children. Interactions revealed that the intervention effect was stronger at 6 months than 12 months post-intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

A playground markings and physical structures intervention had a positive effect on intervention children's morning and lunchtime MVPA and VPA when assessed using heart rate and accelerometry, but this effect is strongest 6-months post-intervention and decreased between 6 months and 12 months.

摘要

背景

课间休息是儿童进行日常身体活动的机会。本研究旨在调查操场干预对儿童在上午和午餐时间课间休息时中等到剧烈(MVPA)和剧烈体力活动(VPA)的 12 个月影响。

方法

来自 26 所小学的 470 名儿童(232 名男孩,238 名女孩)参与了这项研究。15 所学校使用操场标记和物理结构重新设计了操场环境。11 所学校作为社会经济匹配的对照组。在干预前、6 个月和 12 个月后,使用心率和加速度计来量化身体活动水平。采用 3 级(时间、学生和学校)多层分析来确定干预在时间上对 MVPA 和 VPA 的影响。

结果

在上午和午餐时间的课间休息期间,MVPA 和 VPA 出现了积极但无统计学意义的干预效果。干预组的课间休息活动比对照组更活跃。交互作用表明,干预效果在干预后 6 个月比 12 个月更强。

结论

使用心率和加速度计评估时,操场标记和物理结构干预对干预组儿童的上午和午餐时间 MVPA 和 VPA 有积极影响,但这种影响在干预后 6 个月最强,在 6 个月至 12 个月之间逐渐减弱。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验