Stratton G
Centre for Physical Education, Sport and Dance, Liverpool John Moores University, UK.
Ergonomics. 2000 Oct;43(10):1538-46. doi: 10.1080/001401300750003961.
The physical activity levels of 47, 5- to 7-year-old children were assessed before and after a school playground was painted with fluorescent markings. Children's physical activity was measured using heart rate telemetry during three playtimes before and after the markings were laid down. Children in the experimental and control groups spent 27 and 29 min, respectively, in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) before the intervention, increasing to 45 and 36 min, respectively, during the intervention period. MVPA, vigorous physical activity (VPA) and mean heart rate remained relatively stable in the control group compared to respective increases of 10 and 5% of playtime and 6 beats min(-1) in the experimental group during the intervention period. The ANCOVA analysis revealed significant interactions and main effects for the intervention for MVPA, VPA and mean heart rate. Conversely there were no main effect differences between groups. These results suggest that while playground markings had a significant and positive influence on children's physical activity, factors other than playground markings may also influence children's physically active play.
在学校操场涂上荧光标记前后,对47名5至7岁儿童的身体活动水平进行了评估。在铺设标记前后的三个游戏时间内,使用心率遥测技术测量儿童的身体活动。干预前,实验组和对照组儿童进行中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)的时间分别为27分钟和29分钟,在干预期分别增加到45分钟和36分钟。与对照组相比,干预期间对照组的MVPA、剧烈身体活动(VPA)和平均心率保持相对稳定,而实验组的游戏时间分别增加了10%和5%,平均心率增加了6次/分钟。协方差分析显示,干预对MVPA、VPA和平均心率有显著的交互作用和主效应。相反,两组之间没有主效应差异。这些结果表明,虽然操场标记对儿童的身体活动有显著的积极影响,但操场标记以外的因素也可能影响儿童的积极玩耍。