外交政策对健康有影响吗？
Can foreign policy make a difference to health?
机构信息
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Oslo, Norway.
出版信息
PLoS Med. 2010 May 11;7(5):e1000274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000274.
Abstract
As part of the series on Global Health Diplomacy, Sigrun Møgedal and Benedikte Alveberg provide a diplomatic perspective on how foreign policy can make a difference to global health challenges.
摘要
作为全球卫生外交系列的一部分，Sigrun Møgedal 和 Benedikte Alveberg 从外交政策的角度出发，探讨了这一政策如何对全球卫生挑战产生影响。
相似文献
1
Can foreign policy make a difference to health?外交政策对健康有影响吗？
PLoS Med. 2010 May 11;7(5):e1000274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000274.
2
Foreign policy, trade and health: at the cutting edge of global health diplomacy.外交政策、贸易与健康：处于全球健康外交的前沿
Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Mar;85(3):162. doi: 10.2471/blt.07.041079.
3
Health imperatives in foreign policy: the case of Malaysia.外交政策中的健康要务：以马来西亚为例。
Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Mar;85(3):225-9. doi: 10.2471/blt.06.037119.
4
Governing the globalization of public health.管控公共卫生的全球化。
J Law Med Ethics. 2004 Fall;32(3):500-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00163.x.
5
Global health: current issues, future trends and foreign policy.全球健康：当前问题、未来趋势与外交政策。
Clin Med (Lond). 2009 Jun;9(3):247-53. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.9-3-247.
6
Health and security in foreign policy.外交政策中的健康与安全。
Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Mar;85(3):233-4. doi: 10.2471/blt.06.036889.
7
The World Health Organization and its work. 1993.世界卫生组织及其工作。1993年。
Am J Public Health. 2008 Sep;98(9):1594-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.98.9.1594.
8
Is there a lawyer in the house: the law of global public health?屋里有律师吗：全球公共卫生法？
J Law Med Ethics. 2005 Winter;33(4 Suppl):19-23.
9
The Global Campaign for the Health MDGs: challenges, opportunities, and the imperative of shared learning.全球促进健康千年发展目标运动：挑战、机遇及共同学习的必要性
Lancet. 2007 Sep 22;370(9592):1018-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61458-5.
10
World health organization perspective on implementation of International Health Regulations.世界卫生组织对《国际卫生条例》执行情况的看法。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;18(7):1041-6. doi: 10.3201/eid1807.120395.
引用本文的文献
1
Canada's global health role: supporting equity and global citizenship as a middle power.加拿大的全球卫生角色：作为中等强国，支持公平和全球公民身份。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 28;391(10131):1736-1748. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30322-2. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
2
Are national policies on global health in fact national policies on global health governance? A comparison of policy designs from Norway and Switzerland.各国的全球卫生政策实际上是关于全球卫生治理的国家政策吗？挪威和瑞士政策设计的比较。
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Apr 4;2(2):e000120. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000120. eCollection 2017.
3
Framing health and foreign policy: lessons for global health diplomacy.健康与外交政策的构建：全球卫生外交的经验教训。
Global Health. 2010 Aug 22;6:14. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-6-14.
本文引用的文献
1
Negotiating equitable access to influenza vaccines: global health diplomacy and the controversies surrounding avian influenza H5N1 and pandemic influenza H1N1.协商公平获得流感疫苗的机会：全球卫生外交以及禽流感 H5N1 和大流行性流感 H1N1 引发的争议。
PLoS Med. 2010 May 4;7(5):e1000247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000247.
2
China's engagement with global health diplomacy: was SARS a watershed?中国参与全球卫生外交：非典是一个分水岭吗？
PLoS Med. 2010 Apr 27;7(4):e1000266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000266.
3
Health diplomacy and the enduring relevance of foreign policy interests.卫生外交与外交政策利益的持久相关性。
PLoS Med. 2010 Apr 20;7(4):e1000226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000226.
4
Brazil and the framework convention on tobacco control: global health diplomacy as soft power.巴西与《烟草控制框架公约》：作为软实力的全球卫生外交。
PLoS Med. 2010 Apr 20;7(4):e1000232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000232.
5
Oslo Ministerial Declaration--global health: a pressing foreign policy issue of our time.《奥斯陆部长级宣言》——全球卫生：我们这个时代紧迫的外交政策问题。
Lancet. 2007 Apr 21;369(9570):1373-1378. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60498-X.
Zotero 插件