Institute for Health Economics and Policy, Research Department, 1-5-11, Nishishinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0003, Japan.
Institute for Health Economics and Policy, Research Department, 1-5-11, Nishishinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0003, Japan.
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jul;71(2):400-404. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.046. Epub 2010 May 18.
In April 2006, a national elder abuse prevention and caregiver support law was enacted in Japan, where elder abuse prevention is carried out by municipalities, and caregiver support and intervention are provided by a public long-term care insurance program. The aims of this study were (1) to examine factors at baseline affecting disparities in the progress of systems development for elder abuse prevention among municipalities, and (2) to determine what kind of support municipalities request from prefectural or national governments to help municipalities develop systems for elder abuse prevention. Written questionnaires were administered to the most knowledgeable person in the department responsible for reporting elder abuse in each municipal government between December 2006 and October 2008. The final sample for analysis consisted of 489 (26.6% of 1840) municipalities that provided complete information. Municipalities that achieved a high level of implementation originally had a higher rate of reports of abuse per 1000 elderly persons and greater involvement by police and advocacy groups at baseline. Since cities were the largest type of municipality, they had the greatest number of activities as of 2 years after implementation of the law. The results highlight that the prefectural or national government should offer different types of support according to the kind of municipality: sharing and using experts in an extended association for municipalities with limited resources and smaller size (towns and villages) and aggregating information on difficult cases for larger municipalities (cities). Further research should investigate specific strategies that the prefectural or national government can implement to help promote systems development for municipalities with low rates of reported cases of elder abuse, such as training programs to ensure that all care providers can recognize the signs and symptoms of elder abuse.
2006 年 4 月,日本颁布了一项全国性的老年人虐待预防和护理人员支持法,该法由市町村负责老年人虐待预防工作,由公共长期护理保险计划提供护理人员支持和干预。本研究的目的是:(1) 研究基线时影响市町村老年人虐待预防系统发展差异的因素;(2) 确定市町村向都道府县或国家政府请求何种支持以帮助其发展老年人虐待预防系统。2006 年 12 月至 2008 年 10 月期间,向每个市政府负责报告老年人虐待事件的部门中最了解情况的人员发放了书面调查问卷。分析的最终样本包括 489 个(1840 个中的 26.6%)提供完整信息的市町村。最初实施水平较高的市町村,每 1000 名老年人中虐待报告率较高,基线时警察和倡导团体的参与度也较高。由于城市是最大的市町村类型,因此在法律实施两年后,它们开展的活动最多。结果表明,都道府县或国家政府应根据市町村的类型提供不同类型的支持:为资源有限、规模较小的市町村(城镇和村庄)提供共享和利用专家的服务,并为较大的市町村(城市)汇总有关疑难案件的信息。进一步的研究应调查都道府县或国家政府可以实施的具体策略,以帮助促进报告虐待老年人案件率较低的市町村的系统发展,例如培训计划,以确保所有护理人员都能识别老年人虐待的迹象和症状。