烧伤瘢痕评估:客观瘢痕评估工具的系统评价。
Burn scar assessment: A systematic review of objective scar assessment tools.
机构信息
Department of General Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
出版信息
Burns. 2010 Dec;36(8):1157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.03.016. Epub 2010 May 21.
PURPOSE
All deep second and third degree burns are at risk to develop hypertrophic scars which can severely undermine the quality of survival. To assess the severity of scarring, several technical devices or tools have been introduced to evaluate one or more aspects of the scar, enabling comparison of different treatment protocols and allowing an objective follow-up. The objective of this study was to review which tools can be used in objective burn scar assessment.
BASIC PROCEDURES
The Systematic literature search involving PubMed, the Web of Science (incl. Science Citation Index).
MAIN FINDINGS
51 articles with burn scar assessment as main topic were found. Several characteristics of the scar can be assessed, such as color, metric features and elasticity, but none of the available tools covers the whole aspect of the scar. Especially subjective factors such as pain and itching cannot be assessed with those tools, in spite of their great impact on the patient's quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS
Scar tools enable objective and reproducible evaluation of scars, which is essential for scientific studies and medico-legal purposes, and in selected cases for the clinical follow-up of an individual patient. Further studies to evaluate these tools on scars are nevertheless required.
目的
所有深二度和三度烧伤都有发展为增生性瘢痕的风险,这可能严重影响生存质量。为了评估瘢痕的严重程度,已经引入了几种技术设备或工具来评估瘢痕的一个或多个方面,从而能够比较不同的治疗方案,并进行客观的随访。本研究的目的是回顾哪些工具可用于客观的烧伤瘢痕评估。
基本程序
系统文献检索涉及 PubMed 和 Web of Science(包括科学引文索引)。
主要发现
共发现 51 篇以烧伤瘢痕评估为主要主题的文章。可以评估瘢痕的几个特征,如颜色、度量特征和弹性,但现有的工具都没有涵盖瘢痕的全部方面。特别是疼痛和瘙痒等主观因素,尽管对患者的生活质量有很大影响,但这些工具却无法评估。
结论
瘢痕工具可实现对瘢痕的客观和可重复评估,这对于科学研究和医学法律目的至关重要,并且在某些情况下,对个别患者的临床随访也很重要。然而,仍需要进一步的研究来评估这些工具对瘢痕的评估效果。