• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动管腔分割在钙化斑块中的应用:双能 CT 与标准重建技术的对比,及其与数字减影血管造影的比较。

Automatic lumen segmentation in calcified plaques: dual-energy CT versus standard reconstructions in comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jun;194(6):1590-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3550.

DOI:10.2214/AJR.09.3550
PMID:20489101
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Dual-energy CT has the potential to automatically remove calcified plaques from angiographic data sets. The objective of this study is to compare the accuracy of visual grading of stenoses after plaque removal with visual grading in standard reconstructions. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was used as a reference standard.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients underwent dual-energy CT (140 kV and 80 mAs; 80 kV and 234 mAs) angiography and DSA. Plaque and bone removal was performed. Twenty-nine calcified stenoses were quantified using standard reconstructions, plaque and bone removal maximum intensity projections after plaque and bone removal, and DSA images, according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria. The accuracy of the detection of relevant stenoses (> 70%) and occlusions was assessed. Correlation coefficients of the grades of stenoses with DSA were calculated. The influence of vessel enhancement on the accuracy of plaque removal was analyzed.

RESULTS

The average postprocessing time was 45 seconds. After plaque removal, all 25 relevant and four nonrelevant stenoses were correctly detected. Six relevant stenoses were overestimated as complete occlusions. With the standard reconstructions, two nonrelevant stenoses were overestimated as relevant. Correlation coefficients (r(2)) for the grading of stenoses after plaque removal and with standard reconstructions versus DSA were 0.7694 and 0.4329, respectively. Vessel contrast enhancement correlated weakly (r(2) = 0.2072) with the accuracy of plaque removal.

CONCLUSION

Dual-energy CT with plaque removal automatically delivers CT luminograms with a high sensitivity for the detection of relevant stenoses and a higher correlation to DSA than standard reconstructions but frequently leads to an overestimation of high-grade stenoses as occlusions. Thus, dual-energy CT plaque and bone removal should be used complementary to standard reconstructions, and not exclusively.

摘要

目的

双能 CT 有可能自动从血管造影数据集去除钙化斑块。本研究的目的是比较斑块去除后狭窄程度的视觉评分与标准重建的视觉评分的准确性。数字减影血管造影(DSA)被用作参考标准。

受试者和方法

25 例患者接受了双能 CT(140kV 和 80mAs;80kV 和 234mAs)血管造影和 DSA。进行了斑块和骨去除。根据北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验标准,使用标准重建、斑块和骨去除后最大强度投影以及 DSA 图像对 29 个钙化狭窄部位进行定量评估。评估相关狭窄(>70%)和闭塞的检测准确性。计算狭窄程度与 DSA 的相关系数。分析血管增强对斑块去除准确性的影响。

结果

平均后处理时间为 45 秒。在斑块去除后,所有 25 个相关狭窄和 4 个不相关狭窄均被正确检测到。6 个相关狭窄被高估为完全闭塞。使用标准重建,两个不相关狭窄被高估为相关狭窄。斑块去除和标准重建后狭窄程度的分级与 DSA 的相关系数(r²)分别为 0.7694 和 0.4329。血管对比增强与斑块去除的准确性呈弱相关(r²=0.2072)。

结论

双能 CT 斑块去除可自动提供 CT 血管造影图,对相关狭窄的检测具有较高的敏感性,与 DSA 的相关性高于标准重建,但经常导致高级别狭窄被高估为闭塞。因此,双能 CT 斑块和骨去除应与标准重建互补使用,而不是单独使用。

相似文献

1
Automatic lumen segmentation in calcified plaques: dual-energy CT versus standard reconstructions in comparison with digital subtraction angiography.自动管腔分割在钙化斑块中的应用:双能 CT 与标准重建技术的对比,及其与数字减影血管造影的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jun;194(6):1590-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3550.
2
Dual energy CTA of the carotid bifurcation: advantage of plaque subtraction for assessment of grade of the stenosis and morphology.颈动脉分叉部双能量 CTA:斑块减影在评估狭窄程度和形态方面的优势。
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Nov;80(2):e120-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.08.028. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
3
Dual-energy CT head bone and hard plaque removal for quantification of calcified carotid stenosis: utility and comparison with digital subtraction angiography.双能量CT去除头部骨骼和硬斑块以量化钙化性颈动脉狭窄:效用及与数字减影血管造影的比较
Eur Radiol. 2009 Aug;19(8):2060-5. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1358-x. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
4
Modified Dual-Energy Algorithm for Calcified Plaque Removal: Evaluation in Carotid Computed Tomography Angiography and Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.改良双能算法去除钙化斑块:在颈动脉 CT 血管造影中的评估及与数字减影血管造影的比较。
Invest Radiol. 2017 Nov;52(11):680-685. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000391.
5
Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography.双能量 CT 血管造影在颅内动脉瘤评估中的应用:图像质量、辐射剂量,以及与三维旋转数字减影血管造影的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jan;194(1):23-30. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2290.
6
Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.颈动脉狭窄:CT、三维钆增强磁共振成像与传统血管造影术的前瞻性比较
Radiology. 2001 Jul;220(1):179-85. doi: 10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl35179.
7
Automatic bone and plaque removal using dual energy CT for head and neck angiography: feasibility and initial performance evaluation.利用双能 CT 对头颈部血管造影进行自动骨和斑块去除:可行性和初步性能评估。
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Oct;76(1):61-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
8
[Spiral CT angiography versus DSA in detection of carotid stenoses].[螺旋CT血管造影术与数字减影血管造影术在检测颈动脉狭窄中的应用比较]
Zentralbl Chir. 1996;121(12):1018-22.
9
[Dual-energy CT angiography for evaluation of internal carotid artery stenosis and occlusion].双能量CT血管造影术用于评估颈内动脉狭窄和闭塞
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2009 Apr;31(2):215-20.
10
Dual energy CT of peripheral arteries: effect of automatic bone and plaque removal on image quality and grading of stenoses.双能 CT 在外周动脉中的应用:自动骨和斑块去除对狭窄程度的图像质量和分级的影响。
Eur J Radiol. 2008 Dec;68(3):414-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.09.016. Epub 2008 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
An Overview of Clinical Examinations in the Evaluation and Assessment of Arterial and Venous Insufficiency Wounds.评估和评定动静脉功能不全伤口时临床检查概述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jul 27;13(15):2494. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13152494.
2
Dual Energy Computed Tomography of Internal Carotid Artery: A Modified Dual-Energy Algorithm for Calcified Plaque Removal, Compared With Digital Subtraction Angiography.颈内动脉双能量计算机断层扫描:一种用于去除钙化斑块的改良双能量算法,与数字减影血管造影术的比较
Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 4;11:621202. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.621202. eCollection 2020.
3
K-edge subtraction imaging for iodine and calcium separation at a compact synchrotron x-ray source.
紧凑型同步加速器X射线源下用于碘和钙分离的K边减法成像
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2020 Mar;7(2):023504. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.2.023504. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
4
Modified calcium subtraction in dual-energy CT angiography of the lower extremity runoff: impact on diagnostic accuracy for stenosis detection.下肢流出道双能 CT 血管造影中改良的钙减法:对狭窄检测诊断准确性的影响。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep;29(9):4783-4793. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06032-y. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
5
Principles and Clinical Application of Dual-energy Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Cerebrovascular Disease.双能量计算机断层扫描在脑血管疾病评估中的原理及临床应用
J Clin Imaging Sci. 2016 Jun 29;6:27. doi: 10.4103/2156-7514.185003. eCollection 2016.
6
Dual-Energy CT: What the Neuroradiologist Should Know.双能CT:神经放射科医生应了解的内容。
Curr Radiol Rep. 2015;3(5):16. doi: 10.1007/s40134-015-0097-9.
7
Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.存在广泛钙化时颈动脉狭窄的分级:双能量CT血管造影与对比增强磁共振血管造影的比较
Clin Neuroradiol. 2015 Mar;25(1):33-40. doi: 10.1007/s00062-013-0276-0. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
8
128-slice acceletated-pitch dual energy CT angiography of the head and neck: comparison of different low contrast medium volumes.128 层螺旋加速管电压切换双能量 CT 头颈部血管成像:不同低浓度对比剂用量的对比研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 19;8(11):e80939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080939. eCollection 2013.
9
Initial experience with single-source dual-energy CT abdominal angiography and comparison with single-energy CT angiography: image quality, enhancement, diagnosis and radiation dose.单源双能 CT 腹部血管造影的初步经验及与单能 CT 血管造影的比较:图像质量、增强、诊断和辐射剂量。
Eur Radiol. 2013 Feb;23(2):351-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2624-x. Epub 2012 Aug 25.