Chen Yu, Xue Hua-Dan, Jin Zheng-Yu, Liu Wei, Sun Hao, Wang Xuan, Zhao Wen-Min, Wang Yun, Mu Wen-Bin
Department of Radiology, PUMC Hospital, CAMS and PUMC, Beijing 100730, China.
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2009 Apr;31(2):215-20.
To compare the feasibility of bone and calcified plaque subtracted dual-energy CT angiography (CTA) with time of flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF MRA) in evaluation of internal carotid artery atherosclerosis.
Totally 32 patients received a dual-energy CTA scan, along with a cerebral TOF MRA scan before or after CTA examination from one day to one month. Dual-energy software was used for bone and calcified plaque subtraction. Five anatomical segments were described for each internal carotid artery according to Fischer (1938). Ratings were based on a 1-4 scale for the dual-energy CTA maximum intensity projection (MIP) image: 1 not diagnostic, 2 partially diagnostic, 3 diagnostic, and 4 excellent. Lesions were categorized as mild (0-29%), moderate (30%-69%), severe (70%-99%), or occluded (no flow detected). Stenosis of internal carotid artery was evaluated based on post-subtracted CTA images and TOF MRA images.
In 320 arterial segments, 99% of arterial segments were > or = 3 score. Grading of stenosis on dual-energy CTA agreed with grading of stenoses on MRA images in 98% of arteries. In the mild and occlusion group, the agreement was 100% respectively. In the moderate and severe group, dual-energy CTA showed more severe stenosis than MRA in 7 vessels and there was significant difference between the results from the two different modalities (Z = -3.071, P = 0.002).
Dual-energy CTA can be used to assess the stenosis of internal arteries around skull base, but may exaggerate the severe stenosis of cerebral arteries compared with TOF MRA.
比较骨与钙化斑块去除的双能量CT血管造影(CTA)与时间飞跃磁共振血管造影(TOF MRA)评估颈内动脉粥样硬化的可行性。
32例患者接受双能量CTA扫描,并在CTA检查前或检查后1天至1个月内接受脑部TOF MRA扫描。使用双能量软件去除骨与钙化斑块。根据Fischer(1938年)的方法,对每条颈内动脉描述5个解剖节段。基于双能量CTA最大密度投影(MIP)图像采用1-4分制评分:1分,无法诊断;2分,部分诊断;3分,可诊断;4分,优秀。病变分为轻度(0-29%)、中度(30%-69%)、重度(70%-99%)或闭塞(未检测到血流)。基于去除斑块后的CTA图像和TOF MRA图像评估颈内动脉狭窄情况。
在320个动脉节段中,99%的动脉节段评分为≥3分。98%的动脉中,双能量CTA的狭窄分级与MRA图像上的狭窄分级一致。在轻度和闭塞组中,一致性分别为100%。在中度和重度组中,双能量CTA显示7条血管的狭窄程度比MRA更严重,两种不同检查方法的结果之间存在显著差异(Z = -3.071,P = 0.002)。
双能量CTA可用于评估颅底周围颈内动脉的狭窄情况,但与TOF MRA相比,可能会夸大脑动脉的重度狭窄程度。