Cheng Alice Y Y, Leiter Lawrence A
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Toronto and Keenan Research Centre in Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 May;17 Suppl 1:S25-31. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000368194.32356.5f.
For the reduction of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes, glycemic control has been shown to be an important and effective intervention. However, considering the findings from several recent, large, randomized controlled trials, the utility of very tight glycemic control in all those with type 2 diabetes, for the reduction of cardiovascular disease remains controversial. The decision to aim for very tight glycemic control must be individualized and the potential benefit of reduced risk of nephropathy must be weighed against the increased risk for hypoglycemia. The results of the 10-year post-trial monitoring of the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) demonstrated macrovascular benefits of glycemic control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes but lengthy follow-up was required to demonstrate the effect. This raises the possibility that benefits of glucose lowering to reduce cardiovascular risk is more evident in those with a shorter duration of diabetes and requires many years to manifest. For the time being, there remains good evidence for targeting A1c <7% for microvascular protection but attempts to lower A1c beyond this must be considered on an individual basis.
对于降低2型糖尿病微血管并发症,血糖控制已被证明是一项重要且有效的干预措施。然而,考虑到最近几项大型随机对照试验的结果,对所有2型糖尿病患者进行严格血糖控制以降低心血管疾病的效用仍存在争议。决定追求严格血糖控制必须个体化,并且必须权衡降低肾病风险的潜在益处与低血糖风险增加之间的关系。英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS)10年的试验后监测结果表明,血糖控制对新诊断的2型糖尿病患者有大血管益处,但需要长期随访才能证明其效果。这增加了一种可能性,即降低血糖以降低心血管风险的益处在糖尿病病程较短的患者中更明显,并且需要多年才能显现出来。目前,有充分证据表明将糖化血红蛋白(A1c)目标设定为<7%可实现微血管保护,但试图将A1c降至更低水平则必须根据个体情况考虑。