Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZA, UK.
Surg Endosc. 2010 Dec;24(12):3016-25. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1078-y. Epub 2010 May 19.
The face of surgery has changed over the past two decades with the introduction of laparoscopic techniques. The majority of surgical specialties now perform minimally invasive procedures hence decreasing the scarring, pain, and infection historically associated with open surgery. To further reduce the invasiveness of surgery, new surgical techniques like Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and Single-Port Surgery (SPS) are under development. Despite investment from the medical device industry and enthusiasm from medical professionals, we must analyse patient preferences and expectations of these novel techniques. This analysis will help us establish the demand for such techniques and guide future resource allocation.
A questionnaire-based study was derived to identify whether the concepts of innovative techniques are acceptable to the general population. Their preferences between different available surgical options were recorded along with their choices for new innovative techniques. This study was carried out face-to-face and by using an online survey. It comprised four questions based upon a hypothetical scenario of an acute appendicitis. All the data were captured in a prospective database and analysed using statistical software.
A total of 750 participants from variable backgrounds took part in the study. NOTES or SPS without an established safety profile was accepted by 34.3% of patients. SPS was the most popular method followed by conventional laparoscopy. Open surgery and NOTES were the least preferred (ranked 1.78, 1.98, 2.94, and 3.27, respectively). Choosing between SPS and NOTES only, 80.6% opted for SPS, 11.8% NOTES, and 5.6% declined surgery. The most popular route of access for NOTES is oral (37.7%).
Single-port surgery was the most preferred method and NOTES was the least preferred technique. This shows general acceptance of the concept of virtually scarless surgery but without using the natural orifices.
在过去的二十年中,随着腹腔镜技术的引入,外科手术的面貌发生了变化。现在大多数外科专业都采用微创程序,从而减少了与开放式手术相关的疤痕、疼痛和感染。为了进一步减少手术的侵入性,新的手术技术,如经自然腔道内镜外科(NOTES)和单孔手术(SPS)正在开发中。尽管医疗器械行业进行了投资,医疗专业人员也表现出热情,但我们必须分析患者对这些新技术的偏好和期望。这种分析将帮助我们确定对这些技术的需求,并指导未来的资源分配。
从基于问卷调查的研究中得出,以确定创新技术的概念是否被普通民众所接受。记录了他们对不同现有手术选择的偏好,以及他们对新创新技术的选择。这项研究是面对面进行的,同时也通过在线调查进行。它由基于急性阑尾炎的假设情景的四个问题组成。所有数据都被捕获在一个前瞻性数据库中,并使用统计软件进行分析。
来自不同背景的 750 名参与者参加了这项研究。没有建立安全档案的NOTES 或 SPS 被 34.3%的患者接受。SPS 是最受欢迎的方法,其次是传统腹腔镜。开放式手术和NOTES 是最不受欢迎的(排名分别为 1.78、1.98、2.94 和 3.27)。仅在 SPS 和 NOTES 之间进行选择时,80.6%的患者选择 SPS,11.8%的患者选择 NOTES,5.6%的患者选择不手术。NOTES 最受欢迎的进入途径是口腔(37.7%)。
单孔手术是最受欢迎的方法,NOTES 是最不受欢迎的技术。这表明人们普遍接受几乎无疤痕手术的概念,但不使用自然孔道。