• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

十二步疗法辅助与映射增强认知行为疗法治疗病理性赌博:一项对照研究。

Twelve-step facilitated versus mapping-enhanced cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gambling: a controlled study.

机构信息

McNeese State University, 4205 Ryan St., Lake Charles, LA 70609, USA.

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 2011 Mar;27(1):171-90. doi: 10.1007/s10899-010-9196-y.

DOI:10.1007/s10899-010-9196-y
PMID:20490632
Abstract

This study examined the efficacy of two group treatments for pathological gambling, a node-link mapping-enhanced cognitive-behavioral group therapy (CBGT-mapping) and twelve-step facilitated (TSF) group treatment. Forty-nine participants meeting criteria for pathological gambling were recruited from local newspaper advertisements. These participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: TSF (n = 11), CBGT-mapping (n = 18), and Wait-List control (n = 9); 11 refused treatment prior to randomization. Outcome measures included number of DSM-IV criteria met, perception of control/self-efficacy, desire to gamble, and frequency of gambling episodes. Analyses revealed a significant treatment group x time interaction (η²(partial) = .39). Specifically, the group treatments resulted in significant improvements in the dependent measures, while the Wait-List group remained relatively stable. Overall, CBGT-mapping and TSF had no significant differences on any outcome measure at follow-up assessments. Analysis of post-treatment and 6-month follow-up reveal a significant improvement in gambling outcomes (i.e., fewer DSM-IV criteria met, greater self-efficacy, and fewer gambling episodes (η²(partial) = .35), with treatment gains maintained at 6 months. These results are consistent with previous research for group treatment for pathological gambling and provide support for the utility of TSF and a mapping-based CBT therapy as viable intervention for pathological gambling.

摘要

本研究考察了两种赌博障碍团体治疗方法的疗效,即节点链接映射增强认知行为治疗(CBGT-mapping)和十二步促进治疗(TSF)。49 名符合赌博障碍标准的参与者通过当地报纸广告招募而来。这些参与者被随机分配到三种条件之一:TSF(n = 11)、CBGT-mapping(n = 18)和等待名单对照组(n = 9);11 名参与者在随机分组前拒绝治疗。结果测量包括符合 DSM-IV 标准的数量、控制/自我效能感的感知、赌博欲望和赌博频率。分析显示治疗组 x 时间交互作用具有统计学意义(η²(partial) =.39)。具体而言,团体治疗在依赖指标上均有显著改善,而等待名单组则相对稳定。总体而言,CBGT-mapping 和 TSF 在随访评估中任何结果测量上均无显著差异。治疗后和 6 个月随访分析显示,赌博结果有显著改善(即符合 DSM-IV 标准的数量减少,自我效能感增强,赌博次数减少(η²(partial) =.35),治疗效果在 6 个月时仍得以维持。这些结果与以往赌博障碍团体治疗的研究一致,为 TSF 和基于映射的 CBT 治疗作为赌博障碍的可行干预措施提供了支持。

相似文献

1
Twelve-step facilitated versus mapping-enhanced cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gambling: a controlled study.十二步疗法辅助与映射增强认知行为疗法治疗病理性赌博:一项对照研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2011 Mar;27(1):171-90. doi: 10.1007/s10899-010-9196-y.
2
Group therapy for pathological gamblers: a cognitive approach.病理性赌博者的团体治疗:一种认知方法。
Behav Res Ther. 2003 May;41(5):587-96. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00036-0.
3
Node-link-mapping-enhanced group treatment for pathological gambling.节点-链接映射增强型团体治疗用于病理性赌博
Addict Behav. 2004 Jan;29(1):73-87. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(03)00091-1.
4
Cognitive treatment of pathological gambling.病理性赌博的认知治疗
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2001 Nov;189(11):774-80. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200111000-00007.
5
A preliminary investigation of abstinence and controlled gambling as self-selected goals of treatment for female pathological gambling.将节制与控制赌博作为女性病理性赌博自我选择的治疗目标的初步调查。
J Gambl Stud. 2009 Jun;25(2):201-14. doi: 10.1007/s10899-009-9116-1. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
6
Psychological therapies for pathological and problem gambling.针对病态赌博和问题赌博的心理治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD008937. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008937.pub2.
7
Cognitive and behavioral treatment of pathological gambling: a controlled study.病理性赌博的认知与行为治疗:一项对照研究。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997 Oct;65(5):727-32. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.65.5.727.
8
Treatment of female pathological gambling: the efficacy of a cognitive-behavioural approach.女性病理性赌博的治疗:认知行为疗法的疗效
J Gambl Stud. 2006 Dec;22(4):355-72. doi: 10.1007/s10899-006-9027-3.
9
Treatment goal selection for female pathological gambling: a comparison of abstinence and controlled gambling.女性病理性赌博的治疗目标选择:戒除赌博与控制赌博的比较。
J Gambl Stud. 2007 Sep;23(3):335-45. doi: 10.1007/s10899-007-9064-6. Epub 2007 May 4.
10
Motivational interviewing versus cognitive behavioral group therapy in the treatment of problem and pathological gambling: a randomized controlled trial.动机访谈与认知行为团体治疗对问题性和病理性赌博的治疗效果比较:一项随机对照试验。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2010;39(2):92-103. doi: 10.1080/16506070903190245.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of cognitive-behavioral techniques for problem gambling and gambling disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.认知行为技术对赌博问题和赌博障碍的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Addiction. 2023 Sep;118(9):1661-1674. doi: 10.1111/add.16221. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
2
Treatment for problem gambling and counselors' perception of their clinical competence: a national web survey in Sweden.治疗问题赌博和顾问对其临床能力的看法:瑞典全国网络调查。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2022 Dec 9;17(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13722-022-00347-w.
3
A Gambling Just-In-Time Adaptive Intervention (GamblingLess: In-The-Moment): Protocol for a Microrandomized Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
A psychodynamic approach to the treatment of pathological gambling: Part I. Achieving abstinence.精神分析治疗病理性赌博:第一部分:达到戒断。
J Gambl Stud. 1994 Mar;10(1):21-42. doi: 10.1007/BF02109777.
2
Primed for change: facilitating factors in problem gambling treatment.为改变做好准备:问题赌博治疗中的促进因素
J Gambl Stud. 2009 Mar;25(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s10899-008-9111-y. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
3
Effectiveness of community-based treatment for problem gambling: a quasi-experimental evaluation of cognitive-behavioral vs. twelve-step therapy.
一种即时自适应赌博干预措施(减少赌博:即时):微随机试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Aug 23;11(8):e38958. doi: 10.2196/38958.
4
Filling the GAP: Integrating a gambling addiction program into a shelter setting for people experiencing poverty and homelessness.填补空白:将赌博成瘾项目整合到为贫困和无家可归者提供的收容所环境中。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 15;17(3):e0264922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264922. eCollection 2022.
5
Increased Demographic Representation in Randomized Control Trials for Gambling Disorder in the United States is Needed: A Systematic Review.需要增加美国赌博障碍随机对照试验中的人口统计学代表性:系统评价。
J Gambl Stud. 2021 Sep;37(3):1025-1041. doi: 10.1007/s10899-021-10055-w. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
6
Non-pharmacological treatment of gambling disorder: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.赌博障碍的非药物治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03097-2.
7
Therapist-delivered and self-help interventions for gambling problems: A review of contents.治疗师提供的和自助干预赌博问题:内容综述。
J Behav Addict. 2018 Jun 1;7(2):211-226. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.44. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
8
Measuring treatment outcomes in gambling disorders: a systematic review.评估赌博障碍的治疗效果:系统综述。
Addiction. 2018 Mar;113(3):411-426. doi: 10.1111/add.13968. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
9
Efficacy of face-to-face versus self-guided treatments for disordered gambling: A meta-analysis.面对面治疗与自助治疗对病态赌博的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
J Behav Addict. 2017 Jun 1;6(2):142-162. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.034.
10
Treatment modalities for patients with gambling disorder.赌博障碍患者的治疗方式。
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 28;16:23. doi: 10.1186/s12991-017-0146-2. eCollection 2017.
基于社区的问题赌博治疗的有效性:认知行为疗法与十二步疗法的准实验评估。
Am J Addict. 2008 Jul-Aug;17(4):298-303. doi: 10.1080/10550490802138830.
4
Psychosocial factors related to gambling abstinence and relapse in members of gamblers anonymous.与匿名戒赌会成员戒赌及复赌相关的社会心理因素。
J Gambl Stud. 2008 Mar;24(1):91-105. doi: 10.1007/s10899-007-9071-7. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
5
Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers.针对病态赌徒的认知行为疗法。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Jun;74(3):555-67. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.555.
6
Assessing depression in primary care with the PHQ-9: can it be carried out over the telephone?使用患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)在基层医疗中评估抑郁症:能否通过电话进行?
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Aug;20(8):738-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0144.x.
7
Comparisons between the South Oaks Gambling Screen and a DSM-IV-based interview in a community survey of problem gambling.在一项社区问题赌博调查中,南奥克斯赌博筛查量表与基于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》的访谈之间的比较。
Can J Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;49(4):258-64. doi: 10.1177/070674370404900406.
8
Assessing mental health in primary care research using standardized scales: can it be carried out over the telephone?使用标准化量表在初级保健研究中评估心理健康:能否通过电话进行?
Psychol Med. 2004 Jan;34(1):157-62. doi: 10.1017/s0033291703008055.
9
Node-link-mapping-enhanced group treatment for pathological gambling.节点-链接映射增强型团体治疗用于病理性赌博
Addict Behav. 2004 Jan;29(1):73-87. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(03)00091-1.
10
Trusting problem gamblers: reliability and validity of self-reported gambling behavior.信任问题赌徒:自我报告赌博行为的信度与效度
Psychol Addict Behav. 2003 Sep;17(3):244-8. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.17.3.244.