Département d'Oncologie Moléculaire, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, UMR891 Inserm, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Apr;126(2):407-20. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0897-9. Epub 2010 May 21.
Prognosis of basal breast cancers is poor but heterogeneous. Medullary breast cancers (MBC) display a basal profile, but a favorable prognosis. We hypothesized that a previously published 368-gene expression signature associated with MBC might serve to define a prognostic classifier in basal cancers. We collected public gene expression and histoclinical data of 2145 invasive early breast adenocarcinomas. We developed a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier based on this 368-gene list in a learning set, and tested its predictive performances in an independent validation set. Then, we assessed its prognostic value and that of six prognostic signatures for disease-free survival (DFS) in the remaining 2034 samples. The SVM model accurately classified all MBC samples in the learning and validation sets. A total of 466 cases were basal across other sets. The SVM classifier separated them into two subgroups, subgroup 1 (resembling MBC) and subgroup 2 (not resembling MBC). Subgroup 1 exhibited 71% 5-year DFS, whereas subgroup 2 exhibited 50% (P = 9.93E-05). The classifier outperformed the classical prognostic variables in multivariate analysis, conferring lesser risk for relapse in subgroup 1 (HR = 0.52, P = 3.9E-04). This prognostic value was specific to the basal subtype, in which none of the other prognostic signatures was informative. Ontology analysis revealed effective immune response (IR), enhanced tumor cell apoptosis, elevated levels of metastasis-inhibiting factors and low levels of metastasis-promoting factors in the good-prognosis subgroup, and a more developed cell migration system in the poor-prognosis subgroup. In conclusion, based on this 368-gene SVM model derived from an MBC signature, basal breast cancers were classified in two prognostic subgroups, suggesting that MBC and basal breast cancers share similar molecular alterations associated with aggressiveness. This signature could help define the prognosis, adapt the systemic treatment, and identify new therapeutic targets.
基底型乳腺癌的预后较差,但具有异质性。乳腺髓样癌(MBC)表现出基底型特征,但预后较好。我们假设,先前发表的与 MBC 相关的 368 个基因表达特征可用于定义基底型乳腺癌的预后分类器。我们收集了 2145 例浸润性早期乳腺癌腺癌的公共基因表达和组织临床数据。我们在学习集中基于此 368 个基因列表开发了一个支持向量机(SVM)分类器,并在独立验证集中测试了其预测性能。然后,我们在其余 2034 个样本中评估了其对无病生存(DFS)的预后价值和六个预后标志。SVM 模型在学习集和验证集中准确地对所有 MBC 样本进行了分类。在其他组中,共有 466 例为基底型。SVM 分类器将它们分为两个亚组,亚组 1(类似于 MBC)和亚组 2(不类似于 MBC)。亚组 1 的 5 年 DFS 率为 71%,而亚组 2 为 50%(P=9.93E-05)。该分类器在多变量分析中优于经典预后变量,在亚组 1 中复发风险较低(HR=0.52,P=3.9E-04)。这种预后价值是基底型特有的,其他预后标志在其中均无信息。本体分析显示,在预后良好的亚组中,有效的免疫反应(IR)、增强的肿瘤细胞凋亡、抑制转移的因子水平升高和促进转移的因子水平降低,以及在预后较差的亚组中,更发达的细胞迁移系统。总之,基于源自 MBC 特征的此 368 个基因 SVM 模型,基底型乳腺癌被分为两个预后亚组,这表明 MBC 和基底型乳腺癌具有相似的与侵袭性相关的分子改变。该特征可帮助定义预后、调整系统治疗并确定新的治疗靶点。