Suppr超能文献

在波士顿社区健康中心使用替诺福韦酯联合拉米夫定或恩曲他滨进行非职业性暴露后预防(NPEP)。

Tenofovir DF plus lamivudine or emtricitabine for nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (NPEP) in a Boston Community Health Center.

作者信息

Mayer Kenneth H, Mimiaga Matthew J, Cohen Daniel, Grasso Chris, Bill Ronn, Van Derwarker Rodney, Fisher Alvan

机构信息

Fenway Institute, Fenway Community Health, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008 Apr 1;47(4):494-9. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318162afcb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (NPEP) has been used to decrease HIV transmission after high-risk exposures. However, suboptimal adherence in completing the recommended 28-day course has resulted in prophylaxis failures. Fenway Community Health, the largest center caring for HIV-infected and high-risk men who have sex with men (MSM) in New England, began an NPEP program in 1997, initially using zidovudine-based regimens.

METHODS

Two phase 4 studies, using tenofovir DF regimens combined with either lamivudine or emtricitabine, were conducted. This paper evaluates the experience of those who used tenofovir-based NPEP regimens, comparing the subjects to historical controls who used zidovudine-containing regimens.

RESULTS

Between May 2004 and March 2005, 44 individuals who presented after high-risk sexual exposure were prescribed tenofovir DF/lamivudine for NPEP. Between March 2005 and March 2006, 68 individuals with 72 high-risk experiences received tenofovir DF/emtricitabine, and were compared to122 historical controls who were prescribed 126 courses of zidovudine plus lamivudine between January 2000 and May 2004. Seventy-two percent of those who took tenofovir DF and emtricitabine, and 87.5% of the participants who took tenofovir DF and lamivudine, for NPEP completed their regimens as prescribed, whereas only 42.1% of those who took zidovudine plus lamivudine did so (P < 0.0001). Participants who took tenofovir DF-containing regimens were more likely to report diarrhea or abdominal discomfort; patients who took zidovudine-containing regimens were more likely to report nausea and vomiting, which was often severe enough to lead to product discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Tenofovir DF-containing regimens for NPEP are generally well tolerated with high completion rates. Tolerability and adherence compared favorably to zidovudine-containing regimens used previously. Tenofovir DF-containing regimens should be considered for PEP to enhance adherence and regimen completion.

摘要

背景

非职业性暴露后预防(NPEP)已被用于降低高危暴露后HIV的传播。然而,在完成推荐的28天疗程中依从性欠佳导致了预防失败。芬威社区健康中心是新英格兰地区为感染HIV及高危男男性行为者(MSM)提供护理的最大中心,于1997年启动了一项NPEP项目,最初使用基于齐多夫定的方案。

方法

开展了两项4期研究,采用替诺福韦酯方案联合拉米夫定或恩曲他滨。本文评估了使用基于替诺福韦的NPEP方案者的经历,并将这些受试者与使用含齐多夫定方案的历史对照进行比较。

结果

2004年5月至2005年3月期间,44名在高危性暴露后前来就诊的个体被开具替诺福韦酯/拉米夫定用于NPEP。2005年3月至2006年3月期间,68名有72次高危经历的个体接受了替诺福韦酯/恩曲他滨治疗,并与122名历史对照进行比较,这些对照在2000年1月至2004年5月期间被开具了126疗程的齐多夫定加拉米夫定。接受替诺福韦酯和恩曲他滨进行NPEP的患者中,72%按规定完成了疗程,接受替诺福韦酯和拉米夫定的参与者中这一比例为87.5%,而接受齐多夫定加拉米夫定的患者中只有42.1%完成了疗程(P<0.0001)。接受含替诺福韦酯方案治疗的参与者更有可能报告腹泻或腹部不适;接受含齐多夫定方案治疗的患者更有可能报告恶心和呕吐,其严重程度往往足以导致停药。

结论

含替诺福韦酯的NPEP方案总体耐受性良好,完成率高。与先前使用的含齐多夫定方案相比,耐受性和依从性更佳。对于暴露后预防,应考虑使用含替诺福韦酯的方案以提高依从性和疗程完成率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验