Lawrence Jeanette A, Dodds Agnes E
The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2010 Dec;44(4):299-309. doi: 10.1007/s12124-010-9129-4.
In this paper, we take forward Schwarz's (2009) disjunction between measurement-apparatus-questionnaire and measurement-apparatus-man to examine how the crisis in contemporary psychology is related to assumptions about two sets of connections in research: connections between research tools, research behaviours, and psychological phenomena; and connections between researchers and researchees. By setting up a research problem with methodological and ethical implications, we describe three approaches that involve different assumptions and research activities in relation to the ways each makes these connections: Disassociated, Conventionally Connected and Persons in Dialogue Approaches. We argue that a Persons in Dialogue Approach is the most appropriate approach for a 21st Century psychology in crisis.
在本文中，我们推进了施瓦茨（2009年）提出的测量仪器问卷与测量仪器使用者之间的区分，以研究当代心理学中的危机如何与研究中两组联系的假设相关：研究工具、研究行为与心理现象之间的联系；以及研究者与被研究者之间的联系。通过提出一个具有方法论和伦理意义的研究问题，我们描述了三种方法，这些方法在建立这些联系的方式上涉及不同的假设和研究活动：分离法、传统连接法和对话中的人法。我们认为，对话中的人法是处于危机中的21世纪心理学最合适的方法。
