Kohler Alaric
Institute of Psychology and Education, University of Neuchâtel, Espace L. Agassiz 1, 2001 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2010 Mar;44(1):39-57. doi: 10.1007/s12124-010-9113-z.
This article attempts to show that the metaphorical conception of human being as a machine takes a very specific epistemological standpoint. To make short the complex task of considering the implication of this paradigm for psychological and behavioral sciences, three important mismatches between the machine and the living human will be considered. Experience, agency and plasticity of human being are excluded in the scientific models and research activities when they are situated in the machine paradigm. For this reason, I claim that the machine paradigm does not offer the relevant frame for integrating results from various domains or approaches within human sciences, even if it can sometimes produce relevant scientific knowledge in certain domain at the scale of detailed investigation. Due to the importance of overcoming the fragmentation of scientific knowledge to solve the crisis in psychology, an "organic paradigm" should be elaborated which provides a new epistemological framework.
本文试图表明,将人类隐喻为机器的概念采取了一种非常特殊的认识论立场。为了简化考虑这种范式对心理和行为科学的影响这一复杂任务,将考虑机器与有生命的人类之间的三个重要不匹配之处。当人类的经验、能动性和可塑性处于机器范式中时,它们在科学模型和研究活动中被排除在外。因此,我认为即使机器范式有时能在详细调查的规模上在某些领域产生相关的科学知识,但它并不能为整合人文科学中各个领域或方法的结果提供相关框架。由于克服科学知识碎片化对于解决心理学危机的重要性,应该阐述一种“有机范式”,它提供一个新的认识论框架。