Division of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Cardiovasc Ther. 2011 Dec;29(6):e31-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5922.2010.00166.x. Epub 2010 May 13.
In this review we will discuss the cerebrovascular consequences of dysglycemia and current evidence for therapy, making reference to recent work in the fields of neuropathology, epidemiology, and relevant clinical trial data. Prospective observational and clinical trial data show a clear association between diabetes mellitus and vascular disease, which extends to cerebrovascular disease. The benefits of intervention to lower blood glucose in terms of microvascular health are well established but benefit on macrovascular, especially cerebrovascular, health has been less apparent. Recent large-scale trials and metaanalyses have helped us to better define the role of glycemic control in macrovascular disease. Although few studies of glycemic therapy have used cerebrovascular disease as a primary endpoint, stroke-specific data can be derived. Associations between blood glucose and outcome are also apparent for acute stroke. A period of hyperglycemia is common, with elevated blood glucose in the periinfarct period consistently linked with poor outcome in patients with and without diabetes. The mechanisms that underlie this deleterious effect of dysglycemia on ischemic neuronal tissue remain to be established, although in vitro research, functional imaging, and animal work have provided clues. While prompt correction of hyperglycemia can be achieved, trials of acute insulin administration in stroke and other critical care populations have been equivocal. Diabetes mellitus and hyperglycemia per se are associated with poor cerebrovascular health, both in terms of stroke risk and outcome thereafter. Interventions to control blood sugar are available but evidence of cerebrovascular efficacy are lacking. In diabetes, glycemic control should be part of a global approach to vascular risk while in acute stroke, theoretical data suggest intervention to lower markedly elevated blood glucose may be of benefit, especially if thrombolysis is administered. Trials have been underpowered to demonstrate treatment effect and any intervention must be balanced against risk of hypoglycemia.
在这篇综述中,我们将讨论血糖异常的脑血管后果和当前的治疗证据,并参考神经病理学、流行病学和相关临床试验数据领域的最新研究。前瞻性观察性和临床试验数据清楚地表明糖尿病与血管疾病之间存在关联,这种关联延伸到脑血管疾病。降低血糖对微血管健康的益处已得到充分证实,但对大血管(特别是脑血管)健康的益处则不那么明显。最近的大规模试验和荟萃分析帮助我们更好地定义了血糖控制在大血管疾病中的作用。虽然很少有血糖治疗研究将脑血管疾病作为主要终点,但可以得出特定于中风的数据。血糖与结局之间的关联在急性中风中也很明显。高血糖期很常见,在梗死周边期血糖升高与糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的预后不良密切相关。血糖异常对缺血性神经元组织产生这种有害影响的机制仍有待确定,尽管体外研究、功能成像和动物研究提供了一些线索。虽然可以迅速纠正高血糖,但急性胰岛素给药治疗中风和其他重症监护人群的试验结果并不一致。糖尿病和高血糖本身与脑血管健康不良有关,无论是中风风险还是此后的结局。控制血糖的干预措施是可用的,但缺乏对脑血管疗效的证据。在糖尿病中,血糖控制应该是血管风险整体治疗的一部分,而在急性中风中,理论数据表明降低明显升高的血糖可能有益,特别是如果给予溶栓治疗。试验的效力不足以证明治疗效果,任何干预措施都必须与低血糖风险相平衡。