School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Jul;66(7):1510-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05330.x. Epub 2010 May 13.
This paper is a report of an exploration of the phenomenon of existential distress in patients with advanced cancer from the perspectives of healthcare professionals.
Existential distress is an important concern in patients with advanced cancer; it affects their well-being and needs to be addressed in the provision of holistic care.
Focus groups were conducted from November 2008 to February 2009 with physicians, nurses, social workers, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, and chaplains working in a palliative care unit that served patients with advanced cancer in Hong Kong. Data collection and analysis were guided by the grounded theory approach. All categories were saturated when five focus groups had been held with a total number of 23 participants.
We found three causal conditions of existential distress: anticipation of a negative future, failure to engage in meaningful activities and relationships, and having regrets. Three basic (caring, relating and knowing) and six specific (positive feedback, religious support, new experiences, task setting, exploring alternatives and relationship reconciliation) intervening strategies were identified. Whether the intervening strategies would be effective would depend on patients' openness and readiness; healthcare professionals' self-awareness, hopefulness, and interest in knowing the patients; and a trusting relationship between patients and healthcare professionals. A sense of peace in patients was considered a consequence of successful interventions.
This paper acknowledges the lack of an accepted conceptual framework of existential distress in patients with advanced cancer. It is based on healthcare professionals' views, and further studies from the perspectives of patients and their families are needed.
本文旨在从医护专业人员的角度探讨晚期癌症患者存在性困扰这一现象。
存在性困扰是晚期癌症患者的一个重要问题;它影响着他们的幸福感,需要在提供整体护理时加以解决。
从 2008 年 11 月至 2009 年 2 月,在香港一家姑息治疗病房工作的医生、护士、社工、职业治疗师、物理治疗师和牧师进行了焦点小组讨论。数据收集和分析遵循扎根理论方法。当进行了五组共 23 名参与者的焦点小组讨论后,所有类别都达到饱和。
我们发现存在性困扰的三个因果条件:对负面未来的预期、未能参与有意义的活动和关系、以及遗憾。确定了三种基本(关爱、联系和了解)和六种具体(积极反馈、宗教支持、新体验、任务设定、探索替代方案和关系和解)的干预策略。干预策略是否有效将取决于患者的开放性和准备程度;医护专业人员的自我意识、希望和了解患者的兴趣;以及患者与医护专业人员之间的信任关系。患者的内心平静被认为是干预成功的结果。
本文承认缺乏晚期癌症患者存在性困扰的公认概念框架。它基于医护专业人员的观点,需要从患者及其家属的角度进一步研究。