Suppr超能文献

速尿剂吡咯他尼对人体利钠作用的分析。

Analysis of the natriuretic action of a loop diuretic, piretanide, in man.

作者信息

Noormohamed F H, Lant A F

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, Westminster Hospital, London.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1991 Apr;31(4):463-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1991.tb05563.x.

Abstract
  1. The renal responses to a loop diuretic, piretanide, were investigated in a group of fourteen healthy volunteers. The effect of fluid replacement on the drug-response relationship was evaluated in the absence and in the presence of probenecid pretreatment following both oral and intravenous administration of piretanide. 2. Urinary excretion of piretanide was greater when volume losses were replaced than in the absence of volume replacement (i.v. dose: 3.32 +/- 0.15 vs 2.55 +/- 0.23 mg 6 h-1, P less than 0.01; oral dose: 2.57 +/- 0.09 vs 1.87 +/- 0.27 mg 6 h-1, P less than 0.01). With intravenous piretanide urinary excretion of sodium was likewise greater in the fluid replaced group (198 +/- 4 vs 141 +/- 10 mmol 6 h-1, P less than 0.01); these differences caused by fluid replacement did not however occur after oral dosing of piretanide (181 +/- 12 vs 167 +/- 14 mmol 6 h-1). 3. Probenecid pretreatment significantly decreased the renal excretion of piretanide in all subjects and consistently decreased the natriuretic response with the exception of intravenous piretanide challenge in subjects not undergoing fluid replacement. In this situation, despite probenecid causing a decrease in the amount of drug excreted (2.55 +/- 0.23 vs 1.63 +/- 0.15 mg 6 h-1, P less than 0.05) the sodium output was unaltered (141 +/- 10 vs 152 +/- 16 mmol 6 h-1, NS). 4. Complete replacement of the induced fluid losses resulted in the enhancement of the renal response, without affecting the shape of the diuretic response curve, of either the intravenous or orally administered piretanide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
摘要
  1. 在14名健康志愿者中研究了髓袢利尿剂吡咯他尼的肾脏反应。在口服和静脉注射吡咯他尼后,分别在未进行丙磺舒预处理以及进行丙磺舒预处理的情况下,评估补液对药物反应关系的影响。2. 补液时吡咯他尼的尿排泄量高于未补液时(静脉注射剂量:3.32±0.15 vs 2.55±0.23毫克/6小时,P<0.01;口服剂量:2.57±0.09 vs 1.87±0.27毫克/6小时,P<0.01)。静脉注射吡咯他尼时,补液组钠的尿排泄量同样更高(198±4 vs 141±10毫摩尔/6小时,P<0.01);然而,口服吡咯他尼后,补液并未导致这些差异(181±12 vs 167±14毫摩尔/6小时)。3. 丙磺舒预处理显著降低了所有受试者中吡咯他尼的肾脏排泄,并持续降低了利钠反应,但未进行补液的受试者静脉注射吡咯他尼激发试验除外。在此情况下,尽管丙磺舒使排泄的药物量减少(2.55±0.23 vs 1.63±0.15毫克/6小时,P<0.05),但钠排出量未改变(141±10 vs 152±16毫摩尔/6小时,无显著性差异)。4. 完全补充诱导的液体丢失导致肾脏反应增强,且不影响静脉注射或口服吡咯他尼的利尿反应曲线形状。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Renal tubular secretion and effects of furosemide.肾小管分泌及呋塞米的作用
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1980 Jun;27(6):784-90. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1980.111.
5
Coupling between renal tubular secretion and effect of bumetanide.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1983 Dec;34(6):805-9. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1983.253.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验