Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Jul;56(1):86-94. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.02.346. Epub 2010 May 20.
Because there is wide variation in outcomes across dialysis facilities, it is possible that top-performing units use practices not shared by others. The Identifying Best Practices in Dialysis (IBPiD) Study seeks to identify practices that distinguish top- from bottom-performing facilities by key outcomes, including achievement of recommended hemoglobin targets.
Observational study with cross-sectional study ascertainment of predictors and outcomes.
Facility dialysis practices ascertained using practice surveys of dialysis staff who indicated their level of agreement that each practice occurs in their facility (1-6 on a Likert scale).
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 423 personnel in 90 dialysis facilities from 1 for-profit and 2 not-for-profit dialysis organizations.
Percentage of patients per month per facility with hemoglobin levels of 11-12 g/dL. We divided facilities by median into top- versus bottom-performing groups and compared mean scores for each practice using t tests. We report practices that were statistically significant and achieved at least a medium effect size (ES) >or=0.4.
17 of 155 tested predictors were significant. Achievement of hemoglobin level targets was related most strongly to the use of chairside computers (ES, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.4-1.4]), extent/quality of educational videos (ES, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.2-1.1]), frequency of calling per diem staff if short staffed (ES, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.21-1.1]), policy that nurses pass written competency examinations before hire (ES, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.2-1.0]), and technician cannulation mastery (ES, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.2-1.1]).
This is a cross-sectional study that can address only associations, not causations. Future research should measure the longitudinal predictive value of these practices.
High-performing facilities report more effective education programs, better staff management, higher staff competency, and higher use of chairside computers, a potential marker of information technology proficiency. This suggests that hemoglobin level management is enhanced by processes reflecting a coordinated multidisciplinary environment.
由于透析中心之间的结果存在广泛差异,因此表现出色的单位可能采用了其他单位未采用的做法。“识别透析最佳实践(IBPiD)”研究旨在通过关键结果(包括达到推荐的血红蛋白目标)来确定区分表现出色和表现不佳的单位的实践。
观察性研究,横断面研究确定预测因素和结果。
使用对透析工作人员进行的实践调查来确定设施的透析实践,这些工作人员表示他们所在设施中每项实践的发生程度(Likert 量表上的 1-6)。
来自 1 家营利性和 2 家非营利性透析组织的 90 家透析设施中的 423 名人员。
每个设施每月每例患者的血红蛋白水平为 11-12 g/dL。我们按中位数将设施分为表现出色和表现不佳的组,并使用 t 检验比较每个实践的平均得分。我们报告了统计学上显著且达到至少中效应量(ES)≥0.4 的实践。
155 个测试预测因素中有 17 个具有统计学意义。血红蛋白水平目标的实现与使用床边计算机(ES,0.8 [95%CI,0.4-1.4])、教育视频的范围/质量(ES,0.6 [95%CI,0.2-1.1])、短时间人员不足时致电轮班人员的频率(ES,0.6 [95%CI,0.21-1.1])、护士在入职前通过书面能力考试的政策(ES,0.6 [95%CI,0.2-1.0])和技术员插管熟练程度(ES,0.6 [95%CI,0.2-1.1])的关系最密切。
这是一项横断面研究,只能解决关联问题,而不能解决因果问题。未来的研究应该衡量这些实践的纵向预测价值。
表现出色的单位报告了更有效的教育计划、更好的员工管理、更高的员工能力以及更高的床边计算机使用,这可能是信息技术熟练程度的标志。这表明,血红蛋白水平管理通过反映协调的多学科环境的过程得到了加强。