Québec Heart-Lung Institute, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Jun 1;105(11):1520-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.01.006. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
Platelet aggregation inhibition (PAI) of > or =95% has been associated with improved outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment. A greater thrombotic burden in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) might require higher doses and/or intracoronary delivery of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors to achieve optimal PAI. Using a 2 x 2 factorial placebo-controlled design, 105 patients with STEMI who had been referred for primary PCI within 6 hours of symptom onset were randomized to intracoronary (IC) or intravenous (IV) delivery of an abciximab bolus at a standard dose (0.25 mg/kg) or high dose (> or =0.30 mg/kg) of abciximab. The primary end point was PAI measured at 10 minutes after the bolus of abciximab. Secondary end points included the acute and 6-month outcomes using angiographic parameters, cardiac biomarkers, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, and clinical end points. At 10 minutes after the bolus, the proportion of patients with > or =95% PAI was not different between the IC and IV groups (53% vs 54%, p = 1.00) nor between the high-dose and standard-dose bolus groups (56% vs 51%, p = 0.70). Acutely, the angiographic myocardial blush grades, peak release of cardiac biomarkers, necrosis size, myocardial perfusion, and no reflow as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging, and clinical end points were similar between the groups and did not suggest a benefit for IC compared to IV or high-dose versus standard-dose bolus of abciximab. No increase occurred in bleeding complications with the high-dose bolus or IC delivery. The clinical, angiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging outcomes at 6 and 12 months were similar between the 4 groups. In conclusion, in patients with STEMI presenting with symptom onset <6 hours and undergoing transradial primary PCI, PAI remained suboptimal, despite a higher dose bolus of abciximab. A higher dose bolus or IC delivery of abciximab bolus was not associated with improved acute or late results compared to the standard IV dosing and administration.
血小板聚集抑制(PAI)>或=95%与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂治疗后的改善结果相关。急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)中的血栓负荷较大可能需要更高剂量和/或冠状动脉内给予糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂,以达到最佳 PAI。使用 2x2 析因安慰剂对照设计,105 例 STEMI 患者在症状发作后 6 小时内被转诊行直接 PCI,随机分为冠状动脉内(IC)或静脉内(IV)给予阿昔单抗标准剂量(0.25mg/kg)或高剂量(>或=0.30mg/kg)的阿昔单抗推注。主要终点是阿昔单抗推注后 10 分钟时测量的 PAI。次要终点包括使用血管造影参数、心脏标志物、心血管磁共振成像和临床终点评估的急性和 6 个月结局。阿昔单抗推注后 10 分钟,PAI>或=95%的患者比例在 IC 组和 IV 组之间无差异(53%比 54%,p=1.00),高剂量和标准剂量推注组之间也无差异(56%比 51%,p=0.70)。在急性期,各组间的血管造影心肌灌注分级、心脏标志物峰值释放、坏死面积、心肌灌注和磁共振成像评估的无再流以及临床终点相似,且 IC 与 IV 或阿昔单抗高剂量与标准剂量推注相比,并未提示获益。高剂量推注或 IC 给药并未增加出血并发症。6 个月和 12 个月时的临床、血管造影和心脏磁共振成像结局在 4 组之间相似。总之,在症状发作<6 小时且行经桡动脉直接 PCI 的 STEMI 患者中,尽管给予了较高剂量的阿昔单抗推注,但 PAI 仍不理想。与标准 IV 剂量和给药相比,高剂量推注或 IC 给予阿昔单抗推注并未带来改善的急性或晚期结果。