Departments of Neurological Surgery and Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2010 Jun;66(6):E1215-6. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000369194.13994.62.
Detachable endovascular coils have become a common treatment strategy for carotid cavernous sinus aneurysms (CCAs), but previously unrecognized postprocedure complications may emerge as longer follow-up data are accumulated. In this report, the authors document the first known cases of delayed cranial neuropathy following CCA coiling in 3 patients, all of whom present at least a year postprocedure without aneurysm regrowth. The potential mechanisms underlying this syndrome are discussed as well as their implications on the selection and optimal endovascular management of CCA patients.
Three previously healthy females aged 50, 60, and 62 underwent CCA coiling at our institution and subsequently developed ipsilateral cranial nerve palsies at 56, 28, and 14 months, respectively, post-procedure. At presentation, all 3 patients had a new, recurrent area of flow in their CCA without changes in aneurysm size.
One patient declined further treatment. In the other 2 patients, a stent was placed across the aneurysm neck, and one patient underwent additional coiling. Unfortunately, all 3 patients remained symptomatic at their latest follow-up.
Because of the intimate anatomic environment of the cavernous sinus, neural elements within it may be particularly susceptible to persistent mass or dynamic effects exacerbated by remnant or recurrent flow across the neck of a coiled aneurysm. These 3 cases prompted the authors to advocate for more aggressive efforts to achieve and maintain CCA occlusion. Furthermore, when such efforts are unsuccessful, consideration of traditional carotid occlusion strategies with or without bypass is warranted.
可解脱的血管内线圈已成为治疗颈动脉海绵窦动脉瘤(CCAs)的常见治疗策略,但随着更长时间的随访数据的积累,可能会出现以前未被认识到的术后并发症。在本报告中,作者记录了 3 例 CCA 线圈后迟发性颅神经病变的首例病例,所有患者均在术后至少 1 年出现,且无动脉瘤复发。讨论了该综合征的潜在机制及其对 CCA 患者选择和最佳血管内治疗的影响。
3 名先前健康的女性,年龄分别为 50、60 和 62 岁,在我院接受了 CCA 线圈治疗,随后分别在术后 56、28 和 14 个月出现同侧颅神经麻痹。在出现时,所有 3 例患者的 CCA 均出现新的、复发性血流区域,而动脉瘤大小无变化。
1 例患者拒绝进一步治疗。在另外 2 例患者中,支架横跨动脉瘤颈部放置,1 例患者进行了额外的线圈填塞。不幸的是,所有 3 例患者在最近的随访中仍有症状。
由于海绵窦的解剖环境非常复杂,其中的神经结构可能特别容易受到残余或复发的血流通过线圈填塞的动脉瘤颈部引起的持续肿块或动态影响。这 3 例病例促使作者主张更积极地努力实现和维持 CCA 闭塞。此外,当这些努力不成功时,应考虑传统的颈动脉闭塞策略,包括是否需要旁路。